IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i9p5405-5417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision on the Preferences of Americans Regarding Abortion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Thomadsen

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Robert Zeithammer

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095)

  • Song Yao

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

We examine the effect of a U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding abortion laws on Americans’ preferences for political candidates. The decision was leaked in advance of the official announcement, and we track the evolution of political preferences from before to after the leak and, eventually, to after the formal announcement. The abortion issue was already very important to voters before the leak, but the Court’s decision did not simply make it more important for everyone. We find that the decision decreased the importance weight of abortion for Republicans, while increasing it for independents/nonvoters. Further, the decision increased Republican support for candidates who want to ban abortions although this effect is diminished for candidates that oppose exceptions for rape, incest, or the mother’s health. Nonaffiliated voters move sharply away from candidates who want to ban abortions without exceptions. The decision also resulted in a lasting polarization along gender lines whereby men became more likely to vote for a candidate that supports a ban on abortion, while women are less likely to support candidates that ban abortions.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Thomadsen & Robert Zeithammer & Song Yao, 2023. "The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision on the Preferences of Americans Regarding Abortion Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 5405-5417, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:9:p:5405-5417
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:9:p:5405-5417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.