IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v69y2023i12p7182-7201.html

Phase Transitions in Bandits with Switching Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • David Simchi-Levi

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Yunzong Xu

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; Microsoft Research, New York, New York 10012; Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801)

Abstract

We consider the classic stochastic multiarmed bandit problem with a constraint that limits the total cost incurred by switching between actions to be no larger than a given switching budget. For this problem, we prove matching upper and lower bounds on the optimal (i.e., minimax) regret and provide efficient rate-optimal algorithms. Surprisingly, the optimal regret of this problem exhibits a nonconventional growth rate in terms of the time horizon and the number of arms. Consequently, we discover surprising “phase transitions” regarding how the optimal regret rate changes with respect to the switching budget: when the number of arms is fixed, there are equal-length phases, in which the optimal regret rate remains (almost) the same within each phase and exhibits abrupt changes between phases; when the number of arms grows with the time horizon, such abrupt changes become subtler and may disappear, but a generalized notion of phase transitions involving certain new measurements still exists. The results enable us to fully characterize the trade-off between the regret rate and the incurred switching cost in the stochastic multiarmed bandit problem, contributing new insights to this fundamental problem. Under the general switching cost structure, the results reveal interesting connections between bandit problems and graph traversal problems, such as the shortest Hamiltonian path problem.

Suggested Citation

  • David Simchi-Levi & Yunzong Xu, 2023. "Phase Transitions in Bandits with Switching Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7182-7201, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:12:p:7182-7201
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brezzi, Monica & Lai, Tze Leung, 2002. "Optimal learning and experimentation in bandit problems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 87-108, November.
    2. Jason M. Altschuler & Kunal Talwar, 2021. "Online Learning over a Finite Action Set with Limited Switching," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 179-203, February.
    3. Bergemann, Dirk & Valimaki, Juuso, 2001. "Stationary multi-choice bandit problems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1585-1594, October.
    4. Wang Chi Cheung & David Simchi-Levi & He Wang, 2017. "Technical Note—Dynamic Pricing and Demand Learning with Limited Price Experimentation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1722-1731, December.
    5. Banks, Jeffrey S & Sundaram, Rangarajan K, 1994. "Switching Costs and the Gittins Index," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 687-694, May.
    6. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao, 2019. "Parametric demand learning with limited price explorations in a backlog stochastic inventory system," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 605-613, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Simchi-Levi & Yunzong Xu & Jinglong Zhao, 2025. "Blind Network Revenue Management and Bandits with Knapsacks Under Limited Switches," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2496-2514, September.
    2. David Simchi-Levi & Chonghuan Wang, 2025. "Multi-armed Bandit Experimental Design: Online Decision-Making and Adaptive Inference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4828-4846, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Simchi-Levi & Yunzong Xu & Jinglong Zhao, 2025. "Blind Network Revenue Management and Bandits with Knapsacks Under Limited Switches," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2496-2514, September.
    2. José Niño-Mora, 2020. "Fast Two-Stage Computation of an Index Policy for Multi-Armed Bandits with Setup Delays," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-36, December.
    3. Xiaocheng Li & Zeyu Zheng, 2024. "Dynamic Pricing with External Information and Inventory Constraint," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5985-6001, September.
    4. Brenner, Thomas & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2006. "On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 617-631, December.
    5. Teymourian, Ehsan & Yang, Jian, 2025. "Simple fixes that accommodate switching costs in multi-armed bandits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 616-627.
    6. Kris Johnson Ferreira & Emily Mower, 2023. "Demand Learning and Pricing for Varying Assortments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1227-1244, July.
    7. Forand, Jean Guillaume, 2015. "Keeping your options open," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 47-68.
    8. Alessandro Arlotto & Stephen E. Chick & Noah Gans, 2014. "Optimal Hiring and Retention Policies for Heterogeneous Workers Who Learn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 110-129, January.
    9. Huiwen Jia & Cong Shi & Siqian Shen, 2024. "Online Learning and Pricing for Service Systems with Reusable Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1203-1241, May.
    10. Keller, Godfrey & Oldale, Alison, 2003. "Branching bandits: a sequential search process with correlated pay-offs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 302-315, December.
    11. Karsten T. Hansen & Kanishka Misra & Mallesh M. Pai, 2021. "Frontiers: Algorithmic Collusion: Supra-competitive Prices via," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Noah Gans & George Knox & Rachel Croson, 2007. "Simple Models of Discrete Choice and Their Performance in Bandit Experiments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 383-408, December.
    13. Thomas Loots & Arnoud V. den Boer, 2023. "Data‐driven collusion and competition in a pricing duopoly with multinomial logit demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1169-1186, April.
    14. Leon Yang Chu & Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Jian Wu, 2025. "Solving the Price-Setting Newsvendor Problem with Parametric Operational Data Analytics (ODA)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6627-6646, August.
    15. Konon, Alexander, 2016. "Career choice under uncertainty," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145583, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Theodore Papageorgiou, 2022. "Occupational Matching and Cities," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 82-132, July.
    17. Jason Rhuggenaath & Alp Akcay & Yingqian Zhang & Uzay Kaymak, 2022. "Setting Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions with Unobserved Bids," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2950-2967, November.
    18. Xuejun Zhao & Ruihao Zhu & William B. Haskell, 2022. "Learning to Price Supply Chain Contracts against a Learning Retailer," Papers 2211.04586, arXiv.org.
    19. Raluca M. Ursu & Qingliang Wang & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2020. "Search Duration," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 849-871, September.
    20. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2013. "E Pluribus Unum: Organizational Size and the Efficacy of Learning," DRUID Working Papers 13-09, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:12:p:7182-7201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.