IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v40y1994i1p56-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradoxes of Organizational Theory and Research: Using the Case of China to Illustrate National Contingency

Author

Listed:
  • Oded Shenkar

    (Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978 Israel and College of Business Administration, University of Hawaii-Manoa, 2404 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822)

  • Mary Ann von Glinow

    (College of Business Administration, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199)

Abstract

Chinese organizations are used in this paper to assess the universality of the macro and micro theories of organization that have been largely developed in North America. The analysis suggests that the theories vary in their degree of applicability to the Chinese context. While some theories, such as population ecology, seem to be clearly inapplicable, others, such as the equity theory of motivation, are more suitable, though they all require significant adjustment before they can be used to study and interpret the structure and processes of Chinese enterprises, and the attitudes and behavior of those employed in them. Making the adjustment, however, is likely to lead to positive developments in organizational theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Oded Shenkar & Mary Ann von Glinow, 1994. "Paradoxes of Organizational Theory and Research: Using the Case of China to Illustrate National Contingency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 56-71, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:40:y:1994:i:1:p:56-71
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.1.56
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    culture; institutions; China;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:40:y:1994:i:1:p:56-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew Walls). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.