IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v39y1993i3p307-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multistage Screening Model for Evaluation and Control of Misclassification Error in the Detection of Hypertension

Author

Listed:
  • Herbert Moskowitz

    (Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Robert Plante

    (Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Hsien-Tang Tsai

    (Department of Business Administration, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors with respect to coronary heart disease and stroke. The benefits of early detection of hypertension and the subsequent design of follow-up treatment programs are well documented. Consequently, screening programs have been designed to identify subjects as normotensive (normal) or hypertensive (abnormal). In order for these programs to be effective, full participation of the subject population is required. However, such classification programs can incur massive risks of incorrectly classifying subjects as normotensive who are truly hypertensive and incorrectly classifying subjects as hypertensive who are truly normotensive. To date, the only means to reduce these risks of misclassification is to require subjects to make numerous visits for blood pressure measurement before they can be classified. Such requirements reduce the level of participation in screening programs and also delay the identification of subjects who are truly hypertensive, thereby depriving them of the benefits of early detection and immediate follow-up treatment. We propose a multiple-stage screening model that controls for maximum as well as average misclassification error which is used to design and/or evaluate screening programs for hypertension. A multiple-stage screening model not only permits the early detection of subjects who are truly hypertensive, but also requires a much smaller level of participation of subjects, while retaining control of misclassification risks that are comparable to those of screening programs based on numerous visits. We then design multiple-stage screening programs for several different subject populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert Moskowitz & Robert Plante & Hsien-Tang Tsai, 1993. "A Multistage Screening Model for Evaluation and Control of Misclassification Error in the Detection of Hypertension," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 307-321, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:39:y:1993:i:3:p:307-321
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.39.3.307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.3.307
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.39.3.307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H-T Tsai & L C Thomas & H-C Yeh, 2005. "An economic model for credit assessment problems using screening approaches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 836-843, July.
    2. Tinglong Dai & Kelly Gleason & Chao‐Wei Hwang & Patricia Davidson, 2021. "Heart analytics: Analytical modeling of cardiovascular care," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 30-43, February.
    3. Wu, Shu-Fei & Cheng, Mao-Yi, 2002. "A two-sided sequential screening procedure based on individual misclassification error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 375-391, August.
    4. Marion S. Rauner & Walter J. Gutjahr & Kurt Heidenberger & Joachim Wagner & Joseph Pasia, 2010. "Dynamic Policy Modeling for Chronic Diseases: Metaheuristic-Based Identification of Pareto-Optimal Screening Strategies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1269-1286, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:39:y:1993:i:3:p:307-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.