IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v35y1989i10p1247-1263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development

Author

Listed:
  • Kim B. Clark

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

Abstract

This paper examines the effect on product development of project scope: the extent to which a new product is based on unique parts developed in-house. Using data from a larger study of product development in the world auto industry, the paper presents evidence on the impact of scope on lead time and engineering productivity. Studies of the automotive supplier industry suggest that very different structures and relationships exist in Japan, the U.S., and Europe. Yet there has been little study of the impact of these differences on development performance. Further, little is known about the effects of different parts strategies (i.e. unique versus common or carryover parts) on development. The evidence presented here suggests that project scope differs significantly in the industry, even for comparable products. These differences in strategy, in turn, explain an important part of differences in performance. In particular, it appears that a distinctive approach to scope among Japanese firms---high levels of unique parts, intensive supplier involvement in engineering---accounts for a significant fraction of their advantage in lead time and cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim B. Clark, 1989. "Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(10), pages 1247-1263, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:10:p:1247-1263
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:35:y:1989:i:10:p:1247-1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.