IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v34y1988i6p696-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blacklisting Social Science Departments with Poor Ph.D. Submission Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Richard A. Colombo

    (Department of Marketing, New York University, New York, New York 10003)

  • Donald G. Morrison

    (John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024)

Abstract

In an attempt to reduce the time taken by social science Ph.D. candidates to obtain their degrees, the Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC) of the United Kingdom has decided to withhold funds from social science departments of academic institutions with the poorest Ph.D. submission "rates." Institutions with less than one in ten of their Ph.D. students submitting a thesis within four years of registration will be placed on a blacklist. In interpreting the observed submission rates the ESRC appears not to have taken account of the different numbers of registered students in social science departments, which have cohort sizes ranging from 2 to 79. This failure has potentially counter-productive consequences. An empirical Bayes method is proposed that adjusts estimates of submission rates by taking into account the number of students. The method suggests that differences in true unobservable submission rates between institutions are small and thus observable submission proportions alone do not form a good basis for policy action.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard A. Colombo & Donald G. Morrison, 1988. "Blacklisting Social Science Departments with Poor Ph.D. Submission Rates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 696-706, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:6:p:696-706
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.34.6.696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.6.696
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.34.6.696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:34:y:1988:i:6:p:696-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.