IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v27y1981i4p377-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods of Large Project Assessment Given Uncertainty in Future Energy Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Basil A. Kalymon

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

The continuing oil crisis has created opportunities for developing sources of oil that had only been marginally economic previously. Many such projects, however, require large-scale investments that are recoverable only over very long lifetimes of operation. The profitability of such investments depends critically on the long-run pricing of oil in world markets and the interaction of the economic conditions of consuming nations. This paper develops a framework for analyzing the economics of such projects. Under the conventional assumption that appropriate levels of compensation for the required capital are needed before such large-scale projects are undertaken, the analysis focuses on the rate of return required to induce the large-scale capital expenditures. Both systematic and non-systematic risk exposure of such projects are identified and the critical linkage to world oil markets is defined through a simple market of world oil pricing. The understanding of the nature of project risks is critical to the development of government policy. The risk exposure of investors must be understood both for the development of risk reduction measures and for the establishment of suitable guidelines for capital compensation. The role of governments in energy investment has escalated and the implications for investments by the private sector require explicit recognition and study. It is shown that the traditional theory of risk pricing through the capital asset pricing model generally leads to conclusions that appear to be contradicted by observed investor behavior. Explanation and understanding of the nature of project risks incurred by the large-scale energy project must rely on more complex, disequilibrium models of risk determination. To illustrate the methodology developed, the paper considers investment in the Canadian tar-sands projects in Western Canada. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the rate of return of this project using simulation. The project was described in terms of both a world oil market and a taxation environment. For the range of conditions investigated, the rate of return was found to range between 4 and 20%, with a mean of 14.3% and a standard deviation of 3.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Basil A. Kalymon, 1981. "Methods of Large Project Assessment Given Uncertainty in Future Energy Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 377-395, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:4:p:377-395
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.4.377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.4.377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.27.4.377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcos Vizcaíno-González & Susana Iglesias-Antelo & Noelia Romero-Castro, 2019. "Assessing Sustainability-Related Systematic Reputational Risk through Voting Results in Corporate Meetings: A Cross-Industry Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:4:p:377-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.