IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v14y1967i2pb76-b91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas A. Mahoney

    (Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota)

Abstract

Perceptions and judgments of 84 managers were analyzed in the development of models of organisational effectiveness applied in managerial judgments. Managers described 283 subordinate organization units in terms of 114 variables often mentioned as indicative of organizational effectiveness. Managers also made judgments of the overall effectiveness of these organizations. Analysis of the descriptions indicated that the 114 variables reflect 24 basic dimensions of organizational effectiveness. Models predictive of managerial judgments of organizational effectiveness were developed using these 24 dimensions. A general model accounted for 56 per cent of the variance of judgments of overall effectiveness made by the 84 managers. Other models developed for more homogeneous sub-samples of managers accounted for 75 to 85 per cent of the variance in judgments of overall effectiveness. These models typically involve only seven of the 24 dimensions of organizational effectiveness with a single dimension carrying the most weight in judgments. These models of managerial judgments of organisational effectiveness identify the basic dimensions viewed by managers in judging subordinate organizations and the relative weights assigned them. As such, they provide a useful framework for the development of criteria for judging organizations for administrative and research applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas A. Mahoney, 1967. "Managerial Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 76-91, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:14:y:1967:i:2:p:b76-b91
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.14.2.B76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.2.B76
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.14.2.B76?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glunk, U. & Wilderom, C.P.M., 1996. "Organizational Effectiveness = Corporate Performance? Why and How Two Research Traditions Need to be Merged," Research Memorandum 715, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Glunk, U. & Wilderom, C.P.M., 1996. "Organizational Effectiveness = Corporate Performance? Why and How Two Research Traditions Need to be Merged," Other publications TiSEM e5cdb0ed-7086-4502-8c90-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:14:y:1967:i:2:p:b76-b91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.