IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v13y1967i8pb439-b453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Military Essentiality of Naval Aviation Repair Parts

Author

Listed:
  • Marvin Denicoff

    (Office of Naval Research)

  • Sheldon E. Haber

    (Logistics Research Project, George Washington University)

  • Thomas C. Varley

    (Office of Naval Research)

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of ranking items according to their worth, where each item has associated with it a vector of attributes. In particular, a ranking system is developed and tested for aviation repair parts. The objective of the study is to determine whether some items are more important than others for the accomplishment of aircraft missions. If items differ in essentiality, it is important to take such differences into account in providing logistics support. The essentiality ranking is made by generating a vector of attributes for each repair part on the basis of human judgments. These judgments are obtained using a questionnaire which explicitly establishes the ground rules for making attribute assignments. Judgmental priority rules are then applied to the vectors to rank the items. The proposed methodology was tested for four configurations of aircraft. In the course of the study, a wide dispersion in the essentiality of repair parts was found. Of equal significance, a high degree of consistency was also noted among a large number of respondents. The ranking procedure, although designed for military aircraft, has other applications, including commercial ones. Such applications are appropriate whenever budgetary or other considerations require a priority system for allocating resources, e.g., in the procurement and distribution of material stocks including repair parts.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvin Denicoff & Sheldon E. Haber & Thomas C. Varley, 1967. "Military Essentiality of Naval Aviation Repair Parts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(8), pages 439-453, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:13:y:1967:i:8:p:b439-b453
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.13.8.B439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.13.8.B439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.13.8.B439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:13:y:1967:i:8:p:b439-b453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.