Author
Listed:
- Setareh Farajollahzadeh
(Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada)
- Ming Hu
(Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada)
- Vahid Roshanaei
(Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada)
Abstract
In view of the long wait times for women and the lack of accessibility for LGBTQ+ individuals when they use restrooms, this case provides a set of analytical tools to evaluate wait time disparity among users for different restroom configurations. A stadium manager who faces complaints about excessive restroom wait times aims to retrofit the restroom layout to improve both efficiency, measured in terms of wait time, and fairness, measured in terms of totalitarian and Rawlsian scores. Given that customers have diverse preferences over the use of restroom types, in three modules, students learn to (i) evaluate queuing parameters for a mix of heterogeneous populations, (ii) evaluate queuing metrics for various restroom layouts and discuss their wait time disparities, and (iii) evaluate and discuss the fairness of access to restroom facilities from a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) perspective. By completing this case, students gain an understanding of service systems, learn about process flexibility concepts, and become familiar with DEI concepts and measures. The primary objectives of the case for students are to understand the trade-offs between efficiency and fairness, develop an understanding of multiobjective problems, and improve their skills in employing queuing concepts and tools.
Suggested Citation
Setareh Farajollahzadeh & Ming Hu & Vahid Roshanaei, 2025.
"Case Article—Potty Parity: Stadium Restroom Design,"
INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 79-86, September.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:79-86
DOI: 10.1287/ited.2023.0051ca
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:79-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.