IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v26y2025i1p48-62.html

Infrastructure Decision Preferences and the Influence of Social Justice Education

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Van-Hein Sackey

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Christine Cao

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Destenie Nock

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Daniel Armanios

    (Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom)

  • Alex Davis

    (Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

Abstract

Social justice considerations are critical in today’s engineering education. As an example, access to electricity will be crucial to the development of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) by powering essential sectors and services that would yield economic growth and an improved quality of life. Because infrastructure investments are often allocated to urban areas, it is important for stakeholders to equally prioritize rural electrification in their efforts to achieve universal electrification. These stakeholders make decisions on allocating infrastructure investment based on their underlying values and preferences. It is therefore important to introduce and integrate ideas of fairness and social justice into the engineering curriculum. Our paper investigates the influence of social justice education on decision preferences among students tasked with planning electricity systems. We engaged graduate and undergraduate students in a discrete choice experiment to determine their preferences for equality. In our study, we find that an interactive social justice education module can be effective in increasing equality preferences among non–U.S.-citizen students by 22%. Among students with relatively low preferences for equality, we find that the education module was effective in increasing preference by 18% on average and up to 191%, which translated into more equitable resource allocation. As such, we show that an education intervention for stakeholders may be effective in improving equitable electrification in SSA. The preference elicitation and education module presented in this paper could be repurposed by instructors to include other contexts in their course content (e.g., money, water, housing, etc.) or to people wanting to educate decision makers about social justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Van-Hein Sackey & Christine Cao & Destenie Nock & Daniel Armanios & Alex Davis, 2025. "Infrastructure Decision Preferences and the Influence of Social Justice Education," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 48-62, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:48-62
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2023.0052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.2023.0052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2023.0052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klein, Sharon J.W. & Whalley, Stephanie, 2015. "Comparing the sustainability of U.S. electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 127-149.
    2. Emily Grayek & Yanran Yang & Baruch Fischhoff & Karen E. Schifferdecker & Steven Woloshin & Karla Kerlikowske & Diana L. Miglioretti & Anna N. A. Tosteson, 2022. "A Procedure for Eliciting Women’s Preferences for Breast Cancer Screening Frequency," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(6), pages 783-794, August.
    3. Cannonier, Colin & Mocan, Naci, 2018. "The Impact Of Education On Women'S Preferences For Gender Equality: Evidence From Sierra Leone," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(1), pages 3-40, March.
    4. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    5. James Andreoni & Lise Vesterlund, 2001. "Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 293-312.
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2008. "Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2940-2953, August.
    7. Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro-Gen & Francisco J. Lozano & Kaisu Sammalisto, 2019. "Teaching Sustainability in European Higher Education Institutions: Assessing the Connections between Competences and Pedagogical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Hubert Szczepaniuk & Edyta Karolina Szczepaniuk & Stanisław Bereziński & Paulina Ziółkowska, 2020. "The Importance of Higher Education in the EU Countries in Achieving the Objectives of the Circular Economy in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Soo Khoon Goh & Joe Yee Yong & Cheng Chan Lau & Tuck Cheong Tang, 2017. "Bootstrap ARDL on energy-growth relationship for 22 OECD countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(20), pages 1464-1467, November.
    10. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    11. Martin Westin & Sofie Joosse, 2022. "Whose Knowledge Counts in the Planning of Urban Sustainability? – Investigating Handbooks for Nudging and Participation," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 388-405, May.
    12. Walker, Gordon & Day, Rosie, 2012. "Fuel poverty as injustice: Integrating distribution, recognition and procedure in the struggle for affordable warmth," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 69-75.
    13. Meital Rosenberg & Daniel Erian Armanios & Michaël Aklin & Paulina Jaramillo, 2020. "Evidence of gender inequality in energy use from a mixed-methods study in India," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 110-118, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. İlknur Tayınmak & Habibe Tuğba Erol Korkmaz, 2026. "Prejudice Against Syrian Migrants: The Role of Justice Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement and System Justification," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 259-285, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nock, Destenie & Levin, Todd & Baker, Erin, 2020. "Changing the policy paradigm: A benefit maximization approach to electricity planning in developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    2. Charles Van-Hein Sackey & Destenie Nock & Christine Cao & Daniel Armanios & Alex Davis, 2023. "Incorporating Elicited Preferences for Equality into Electricity System Planning Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    4. Ren, Weihang & Guan, Yongpei & Qiu, Feng & Levin, Todd & Heleno, Miguel, 2025. "Energy justice and equity: A Review of definitions, measures, and practice in policy, planning, and operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Huang, Luling & Nock, Destenie, 2024. "Estimating the income-related inequality aversion to energy limiting behavior in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Steven R. Beckman & Gregory DeAngelo & W. James Smith & Ning Wang, 2016. "Is social choice gender-neutral? Reference dependence and sexual selection in decisions toward risk and inequality," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 191-211, June.
    7. Takashi Oshio & Miki Kobayashi, 2011. "Area-Level Income Inequality and Individual Happiness: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 633-649, August.
    8. Griffin, John & Nickerson, David & Wozniak, Abigail, 2012. "Racial differences in inequality aversion: Evidence from real world respondents in the ultimatum game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 600-617.
    9. Teagan Goforth & Destenie Nock, 2022. "Air pollution disparities and equality assessments of US national decarbonization strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Victoria Danaan, 2018. "Analysing Poverty in Nigeria through Theoretical Lenses," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Francisco Salas-Molina & Filippo Bistaffa & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2024. "A General Approach for Computing a Consensus in Group Decision Making That Integrates Multiple Ethical Principles," Papers 2401.07818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    12. Ashantha Ranasinghe & Xuejuan Su, 2023. "When social assistance meets market power: A mixed duopoly view of health insurance in the United States," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(4), pages 851-869, October.
    13. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.
    14. Gajdos, Thibault & Maurin, Eric, 2004. "Unequal uncertainties and uncertain inequalities: an axiomatic approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 93-118, May.
    15. Becchetti, Leonardo & Degli Antoni, Giacomo & Ottone, Stefania & Solferino, Nazaria, 2013. "Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 96-111.
    16. Eckstein, Zvi & Zilcha, Itzhak, 1994. "The effects of compulsory schooling on growth, income distribution and welfare," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 339-359, July.
    17. McCauley, Darren & Pettigrew, Kerry, 2023. "Building a just transition in asia-pacific: Four strategies for reducing fossil fuel dependence and investing in clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2023. "Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Yonatan Berman & François Bourguignon, 2023. "On the social welfare interpretation of growth incidence curves," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 21(3), pages 723-741, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:48-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.