Author
Listed:
- Charles Van-Hein Sackey
(Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
- Christine Cao
(Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
- Destenie Nock
(Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213; and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
- Daniel Armanios
(Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom)
- Alex Davis
(Department of Engineering & Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)
Abstract
Social justice considerations are critical in today’s engineering education. As an example, access to electricity will be crucial to the development of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) by powering essential sectors and services that would yield economic growth and an improved quality of life. Because infrastructure investments are often allocated to urban areas, it is important for stakeholders to equally prioritize rural electrification in their efforts to achieve universal electrification. These stakeholders make decisions on allocating infrastructure investment based on their underlying values and preferences. It is therefore important to introduce and integrate ideas of fairness and social justice into the engineering curriculum. Our paper investigates the influence of social justice education on decision preferences among students tasked with planning electricity systems. We engaged graduate and undergraduate students in a discrete choice experiment to determine their preferences for equality. In our study, we find that an interactive social justice education module can be effective in increasing equality preferences among non–U.S.-citizen students by 22%. Among students with relatively low preferences for equality, we find that the education module was effective in increasing preference by 18% on average and up to 191%, which translated into more equitable resource allocation. As such, we show that an education intervention for stakeholders may be effective in improving equitable electrification in SSA. The preference elicitation and education module presented in this paper could be repurposed by instructors to include other contexts in their course content (e.g., money, water, housing, etc.) or to people wanting to educate decision makers about social justice.
Suggested Citation
Charles Van-Hein Sackey & Christine Cao & Destenie Nock & Daniel Armanios & Alex Davis, 2025.
"Infrastructure Decision Preferences and the Influence of Social Justice Education,"
INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 48-62, September.
Handle:
RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:48-62
DOI: 10.1287/ited.2023.0052
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:48-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.