IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v24y2023i1p51-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Guidance for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in Introductory Analytics Courses

Author

Listed:
  • Scott P. Stevens

    (Department of Computer Information Systems & Business Analytics, College of Business, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807)

  • Susan W. Palocsay

    (Department of Computer Information Systems & Business Analytics, College of Business, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807)

  • Luis J. Novoa

    (Department of Computer Information Systems & Business Analytics, College of Business, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807)

Abstract

Test writing is a fundamental component of teaching. With increasing pressure to teach larger groups of students, conduct formal assessment of learning outcomes, and offer online and hybrid classes, there is a need for alternatives to constructed response problem-solving test questions. We believe that appropriate use of multiple-choice (MC) questions can alleviate some of these pressures. However, the results will only be acceptable to dedicated faculty if these questions are well written and effective in measuring student learning. In this article, we propose a structured framework consisting of six design principles that serve as a guide for writing MC items that promote higher-order thinking through the use of scenario-based and multistep problems. Then we demonstrate how to apply these principles to develop high-quality test questions in MC format for introductory analytics courses in statistics or operations research/management science.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott P. Stevens & Susan W. Palocsay & Luis J. Novoa, 2023. "Practical Guidance for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in Introductory Analytics Courses," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 51-69, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:51-69
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2022.0274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0274
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2022.0274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan W. Palocsay & Scott P. Stevens & Luis J. Novoa, 2020. "STRATA: A Spreadsheet Tool for Multidimensional Analysis of Operations Research/Management Science Assessment Test Data," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 41-56, September.
    2. John Miltenburg, 2019. "Online Teaching in a Large, Required, Undergraduate Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 89-104, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Cleophas & Christoph Hönnige & Frank Meisel & Philipp Meyer, 2023. "Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 84-94, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:51-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.