IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v9y1979i3p52-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Implementation Research Relevant for the OR/MS Practitioner?

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Anderson

    (College of Business Administration, University of Minnesota)

  • Norman L. Chervany

    (College of Business Administration, University of Minnesota)

  • Ram Narasimhan

    (College of Business Administration, Michigan State University)

Abstract

The last decade has seen an increasing awareness of and concern for the problems associated with the successful implementation of OR/MS methods. This growing awareness has produced two results in the “publishing sector” of the OR/MS profession. With some trepidation [White, Charles H. 1977. Applications publication: An experience. Interfaces 7 (August) 125--126.], practitioners of OR/MS have started to publish the results of actual OR/MS projects. The value of these reports for increasing the chance of more successful implementations of OR/MS efforts is summarized in [Woolsey, Gene. 1976. A triennial editorial policy. Interfaces 6 (August) 3--4.].This article is designed: (1) to examine the relevancy of OR/MS implementation research for practicing OR/MS managers, and (2) to provide some guidelines for improving this relevancy.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Anderson & Norman L. Chervany & Ram Narasimhan, 1979. "Is Implementation Research Relevant for the OR/MS Practitioner?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 52-56, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:3:p:52-56
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.9.3.52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.9.3.52
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.9.3.52?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional: OR/MS implementation;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:9:y:1979:i:3:p:52-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.