IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v7y1977i3p55-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crime Does Pay: An Analysis of the Burglary Profession

Author

Listed:
  • John M. Gleason

    (Texas Tech University, University of Nebraska at Omaha)

  • Darold T. Barnum

    (Indiana University Northwest)

Abstract

A recent paper [Gleason, J., D. Barnum. 1976. Effectiveness of OSHA penalties: Myth or reality. Interfaces 7 (1, Part I, November) 1--13.] examined the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) from a decision theory point of view, in an attempt to determine the effectiveness of the penalty provisions of the Act. That paper may be classified in the general area of the economics of crime, although violators of OSHA standards usually would not be considered criminals. This paper examines a group of people who consider themselves criminals---professional burglars. Those who have chosen crime as their profession are herein defined as rational economic criminals. The high rate of recidivism, especially among burglars (76 percent in 1974 [U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1975. Uniform Crime Report , 1974. Washington, p. 51.]), supports the concept of the rational economic criminal, as does other recent work [Becker, G. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The J. Political Econom. 76 (2, March--April) 169--217; Sjoquist, D. 1973. Property crime and economic behavior: Some empirical results. The Amer. Econom. Rev. LXIII (3, June) 439--446.].

Suggested Citation

  • John M. Gleason & Darold T. Barnum, 1977. "Crime Does Pay: An Analysis of the Burglary Profession," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 55-60, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:7:y:1977:i:3:p:55-60
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.7.3.55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.7.3.55
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.7.3.55?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:7:y:1977:i:3:p:55-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.