IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v55y2025i3p195-223.html

Automating Procurement Practices Using Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyi Li

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AB, United Kingdom)

  • Viviana Culmone

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AB, United Kingdom)

  • Bert De Reyck

    (Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899)

  • Onesun Steve Yoo

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AB, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Conducting a spend analysis of procurement practices is a challenging task for manufacturers. It requires deciphering large-scale spend data in the form of unstructured texts and identifying opportunities for savings. This process relies on procurement experts’ know-how and is often performed manually, a laborious task often leading to missed savings opportunities. Automating spend analysis through natural language processing and machine learning presents several challenges, such as (i) a lack of true detailed category labels for suppliers, (ii) a lack of sufficiently large sets of training data, (iii) hierarchical taxonomies that vary across manufacturers, and (iv) the reduced accuracy of hierarchical categorization algorithms beyond two levels. Our novel three-component classification model tackles these issues, facilitating the automation of spend analysis and the replication of procurement experts’ decision-making processes. By processing input data composed of unstructured spend texts from Cranswick PLC, a leading UK food producer, our model delivers accurate supplier categorizations that pinpoint areas ripe for substantial savings. This approach not only shows greater accuracy compared with existing benchmark models but also aids in identifying key product categories and suppliers for cost-saving initiatives. By simulating the application, we project that our method could bring annual savings of £16 million to £22 million ($20 million to $28 million) for Cranswick PLC, illustrating the significant advantages of automating spend analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyi Li & Viviana Culmone & Bert De Reyck & Onesun Steve Yoo, 2025. "Automating Procurement Practices Using Artificial Intelligence," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 195-223, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:195-223
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2023.0099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2023.0099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2023.0099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Jacques Laffont & Jean Tirole, 1993. "A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262121743, December.
    2. Damian R. Beil & Lawrence M. Wein, 2003. "An Inverse-Optimization-Based Auction Mechanism to Support a Multiattribute RFQ Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1529-1545, November.
    3. Damian R. Beil & Qi (George) Chen & Izak Duenyas & Brendan D. See, 2018. "When to Deploy Test Auctions in Sourcing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 232-248, May.
    4. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    5. Zhixi Wan & Damian R. Beil, 2009. "RFQ Auctions with Supplier Qualification Screening," Post-Print hal-00471441, HAL.
    6. Izak Duenyas & Bin Hu & Damian R. Beil, 2013. "Simple Auctions for Supply Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2332-2342, October.
    7. Charles H. Fine & Evan L. Porteus, 1989. "Dynamic Process Improvement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 580-591, August.
    8. Cuihong Li & Zhixi Wan, 2017. "Supplier Competition and Cost Improvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2460-2477, August.
    9. Zhixi Wan & Damian R. Beil, 2009. "RFQ Auctions with Supplier Qualification Screening," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 934-949, August.
    10. Wedad J. Elmaghraby, 2000. "Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 350-371, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cui Tiening & Liu Mengyun, 2026. "Research on Low-Carbon Development Pathways for Modern Manufacturing in the Capital of China," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 1-1.
    2. Fakhreddin Fakhrai Rad & Pejvak Oghazi & İzmir Onur & Arash Kordestani, 2025. "Adoption of AI-based order picking in warehouse: benefits, challenges, and critical success factors," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(11), pages 3495-3540, November.
    3. Lee Bih Ni & Connie Shin@Cassy Ompok & Nur Farha Binti Shaafi & Arzizul Bin Antin, 2026. "The Use of AI in History Education in Sabah: A Comparative Study of Rural and Urban Schools," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(1), pages 479-488, January.
    4. Lee Bih Ni & Connie Shin@Cassy Ompok & Nur Farha Binti Shaafi & Arzizul Bin Antin, 2026. "The Use of AI in History Education in Sabah: A Comparative Study of Rural and Urban Schools," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(1), pages 1703-1712, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhi Chen & Jürgen Mihm & Jochen Schlapp, 2022. "Sourcing Innovation: Integrated System or Individual Components?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 1056-1073, March.
    2. Zhi Chen & Jürgen Mihm & Jochen Schlapp, 2025. "Sourcing Innovation: When to Own and When to Control Your Supplier," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1869-1888, November.
    3. Yuchen Hu & Martin J. Wainwright & Stephen Bates, 2026. "Buying Data of Unknown Quality: Fisher Information Procurement Auctions," Papers 2604.08821, arXiv.org.
    4. Shivam Gupta & Shouqiang Wang & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2021. "Procurement with Cost and Noncost Attributes: Cost-Sharing Mechanisms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1349-1367, September.
    5. Qi (George) Chen & Damian R. Beil & Izak Duenyas, 2022. "Procurement Mechanisms with Post-Auction Pre-Award Cost-Reduction Investigations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3054-3075, November.
    6. Lorentziadis, Panos L., 2016. "Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 347-371.
    7. Wen Zhang & Qi (George) Chen & Elena Katok, 2021. "“Now or Later?” When to Deploy Qualification Screening in Open-Bid Auction for Re-Sourcing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1715-1733, November.
    8. Yonatan Gur & Gregory Macnamara & Daniela Saban, 2022. "Sequential Procurement with Contractual and Experimental Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2714-2731, April.
    9. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Damian R. Beil & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2014. "Split-Award Auctions for Supplier Retention," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1719-1737, July.
    10. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Sourcing under overconfident buyer and suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 93-109.
    11. Wei Chen & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2018. "Optimal Procurement Auctions Under Multistage Supplier Qualification," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 566-582, July.
    12. Fangruo Chen, 2007. "Auctioning Supply Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1562-1576, October.
    13. Alibeiki, Hedayat & Gümüş, Mehmet, 2020. "Supply competition under quality scores: Motivations, information sharing and credibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Bin Hu & Anyan Qi, 2018. "Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 655-666, October.
    15. Terrence August & Tunay I. Tunca, 2011. "Who Should Be Responsible for Software Security? A Comparative Analysis of Liability Policies in Network Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 934-959, May.
    16. Huang, Min & Qian, Xiaohu & Fang, Shu-Cherng & Wang, Xingwei, 2016. "Winner determination for risk aversion buyers in multi-attribute reverse auction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 184-200.
    17. Karca D. Aral & Damian R. Beil & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2021. "Supplier Sustainability Assessments in Total‐Cost Auctions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 902-920, April.
    18. Strömbäck, Elon, 2015. "Policy by Public Procurement: Opportunities and Pitfalls," Umeå Economic Studies 915, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    19. Xiaoshuai Fan & Ying‐Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "To Bribe or Not in a Procurement Auction under Disparate Corruption Pressure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1220-1245, May.
    20. Vitali Gretschko & Martin Pollrich, 2022. "Incomplete Contracts in Multi-period Procurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5146-5161, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:195-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.