IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v38y2008i1p5-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations Research Advances Cancer Therapeutics

Author

Listed:
  • Eva K. Lee

    (School of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Marco Zaider

    (Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021)

Abstract

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the world's oldest private cancer center, seeks next-generation cancer treatment advances to enhance its ability to treat patients effectively by improving care and reducing costs. Using operations research approaches, our team has devised sophisticated optimization modeling and computational techniques for real-time (intraoperative) treatment of prostate cancer using brachytherapy (the placement of radioactive “seeds” inside a tumor). The resulting system offers significantly safer and more reliable treatment outcomes. In addition, it eliminates the need for preoperative simulation and postimplant dosimetric analysis, resulting in savings of hundreds of millions of dollars per year in the United States alone. Posttreatment quality of life is improved through drastic reduction (up to 45--60 percent) of complications. The reason for this is twofold: (a) treatment plans thus devised deliver less radiation to adjacent healthy structures, and (b) the ability to perform midimplant replanning eliminates the unavoidable discrepancies between planned and actual seed placement in the target. This has a profound impact on the cost of managing treatment-associated morbidity. The procedure uses approximately 20--30 percent fewer seeds and 15 percent fewer needles (used to place seeds inside the prostate gland). As a result, the operating-room time is shortened, and the entire procedure is less invasive. The system has the potential to establish standards and guidelines for cancer treatment quality control and quality assurance of the implantable plan. Wide distribution of our system should allow consistent treatment planning across different clinics and significantly reduce variability in treatment plan quality. The next phase of this effort will expand the applicability of our system to other forms of brachytherapy, such as treatment of breast, cervix, esophagus, biliary tract, pancreas, head and neck, and eye.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva K. Lee & Marco Zaider, 2008. "Operations Research Advances Cancer Therapeutics," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 5-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:5-25
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1070.0327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1070.0327
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1070.0327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva K. Lee & Ferdinand Pietz & Bernard Benecke & Jacquelyn Mason & Greg Burel, 2013. "Advancing Public Health and Medical Preparedness with Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 79-98, February.
    2. Eva K. Lee & Fan Yuan & Alistair Templeton & Rui Yao & Krystyna Kiel & James CH Chu, 2013. "Biological Planning for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Application to Cervical Cancer Treatment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 462-476, October.
    3. Eva K. Lee & Chien-Hung Chen & Ferdinand Pietz & Bernard Benecke, 2009. "Modeling and Optimizing the Public-Health Infrastructure for Emergency Response," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 476-490, October.
    4. Richard L. Francis, 2009. "Location Theory Helps Solve a Double-Vision Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 527-532, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:5-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.