IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v34y2004i3p180-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocating Vendor Risks in the Hanford Waste Cleanup

Author

Listed:
  • J. M. Keisler

    () (Department of Management Sciences and Information Systems, College of Management, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, M/5-230, Boston, Massachusetts 02125)

  • W. A. Buehring

    () (Decision and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Building 900, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4832)

  • P. D. McLaughlin

    () (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352)

  • M. A. Robershotte

    () (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352)

  • R. G. Whitfield

    () (Decision and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Building 900, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4832)

Abstract

Organizations may view outsourcing as a way to manage risk. We developed a decision-analytic approach to determine which risks the buyer can share or shift to vendors and which ones it should bear. We found that allocating risks incorrectly could increase costs dramatically. Between 1995 and 1998, we used this approach to develop the request for proposals (RFP) for the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) privatization initiative for the Hanford tank waste remediation system (TWRS). In the model, we used an assessment protocol to predict how vendors would react to proposed risk allocations in terms of their actions and their pricing. We considered the impact of allocating each major risk to potential vendors, to the DOE, or to both and identified the risk allocation that would minimize the DOE's total cost—its direct payments to vendors plus the costs of any residual risks it accepted. Allocating inappropriate risks to the vendor would have increased costs because the vendor would add a large risk premium to its bids, while allocating inappropriate risks to the DOE also would have increased costs because the vendor would not take adequate risk-reduction measures. With the improved risk allocation, the RFPs resulted in bids that were acceptable to the DOE.

Suggested Citation

  • J. M. Keisler & W. A. Buehring & P. D. McLaughlin & M. A. Robershotte & R. G. Whitfield, 2004. "Allocating Vendor Risks in the Hanford Waste Cleanup," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 180-190, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:180-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1040.0078
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decision analysis; risks; government; agencies;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:180-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Mirko Janc to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.