IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v11y1981i4p70-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reply to William Gehrlein's Commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart S. Nagel

    (Department of Political Science, University of Illinois, 361 Lincoln Hall, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

Abstract

It is pleasing to see Management Science people show increasing concern for public sector problems, including problems that relate to the legal process. It is particularly pleasing to participate in the give and take of developing improved public sector applications, including ones that relate to the Supreme Court's concern for determining when standards of due process, equal protection, or other constitutional rights have been violated. This reply to Gehrlein, William V. 1981. Management science and jury size: A commentary. Interfaces 11 (4, August) 67--69 is written in that light.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart S. Nagel, 1981. "Reply to William Gehrlein's Commentary," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 70-70, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:4:p:70-70
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.11.4.70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.11.4.70
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.11.4.70?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:4:p:70-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.