IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v10y1980i1p72-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Management Science in Office Automation

Author

Listed:
  • N. Dean Meyer

    (The Diebold Group, Inc., 430 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10022)

Abstract

The fields of Management Science and office automation have a great deal in common: both attempt to make new business techniques and procedures useful to the business community; both find themselves delivering computer-based tools to professionals; both are altering the information handling capabilities of their user organizations; and both recognize large gaps between the potential of their technologies and the realities of their utilization. In fact, thoughtful office automation professionals include Management Science techniques among the tools they may implement in the service of user managers; i.e., they view Management Science as a “subset” of office automation. To the extent that office automation professionals structure previously unstructured information processes in the organization, their role appears very similar to common definitions of the function of Management Science. Coming from the office automation perspective, I would propose to the Management Science community that our roles do indeed overlap but are not competitive. On the contrary, very close collaboration is necessary for both communities to achieve their respective and related goals.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Dean Meyer, 1980. "The Role of Management Science in Office Automation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 72-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:72-76
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.10.1.72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.10.1.72
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.10.1.72?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:72-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.