IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v37y2025i6p1587-1604.html

Influence Minimization via Blocking Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jiadong Xie

    (Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Fan Zhang

    (CIAT and Huangpu Research School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510000, China)

  • Kai Wang

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Jialu Liu

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Xuemin Lin

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Wenjie Zhang

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia)

Abstract

We study the influence minimization problem: given a graph G and a seed set S , blocking at most b nodes or b edges such that the influence spread of seed set is minimized. This is a pivotal yet underexplored aspect of network analytics, which can limit the spread of undesirable phenomena in networks, such as misinformation and epidemics. Given the inherent NP-hardness of the problem under the independent cascade and linear threshold models, previous studies have employed greedy algorithms and Monte Carlo Simulations for its resolution. However, existing techniques become cost-prohibitive when applied to large networks due to the necessity of enumerating all the candidate blockers and computing the decrease in expected spread from blocking each of them. This significantly restricts the practicality and effectiveness of existing methods, especially when prompt decision making is crucial. In this paper, we propose the AdvancedGreedy algorithm, which utilizes a novel graph sampling technique that incorporates the dominator tree structure. We find that AdvancedGreedy can achieve a ( 1 − 1 / e − ϵ ) -approximation in the problem under the linear threshold model. For the problem under the independent cascade model, we further propose a novel heuristic algorithm GreedyReplace, based on identifying the relationships among candidate blockers. Experimental evaluations on real-life networks reveal that our proposed algorithms exhibit a significant enhancement in efficiency, surpassing the state-of-the-art algorithm by three orders of magnitude while achieving high effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiadong Xie & Fan Zhang & Kai Wang & Jialu Liu & Xuemin Lin & Wenjie Zhang, 2025. "Influence Minimization via Blocking Strategies," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 1587-1604, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1587-1604
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2024.0591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean Eckles & Hossein Esfandiari & Elchanan Mossel & M. Amin Rahimian, 2022. "Seeding with Costly Network Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2318-2348, July.
    2. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Canh V. Pham & Quat V. Phu & Huan X. Hoang & Jun Pei & My T. Thai, 2019. "Minimum budget for misinformation blocking in online social networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1101-1127, November.
    4. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    5. Devavrat Shah & Tauhid Zaman, 2016. "Finding Rumor Sources on Random Trees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 736-755, June.
    6. Dilek Günneç & S. Raghavan & Rui Zhanga, 2020. "Least-Cost Influence Maximization on Social Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 289-302, April.
    7. S. Raghavan & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Influence Maximization with Latency Requirements on Social Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 710-728, March.
    8. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Cage & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2017. "The Production of Information in an Online World: Is Copy Right?," Working Papers hal-03393171, HAL.
    2. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Tetsuro Kobayashi & Fumiaki Taka & Takahisa Suzuki, 2021. "Can “Googling” correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    5. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.
    6. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Fathey Mohammed & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Yousef Fazea, 2023. "The Impact of Social Media Shared Health Content on Protective Behavior against COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    9. Joël Cariolle & Yasmine Elkhateeb & Mathilde Maurel, 2022. "(Mis-)information technology: Internet use and perception of democracy in Africa," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22010, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    10. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business journalism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Barrera, Oscar & Guriev, Sergei & Henry, Emeric & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, 2020. "Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Luca Braghieri & Ro'ee Levy & Hannah Trachtman, 2025. "Frictions in News Consumption: How to Improve the Social Media News Diet," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 12-16, October.
    13. Sumeet Kumar & Binxuan Huang & Ramon Alfonso Villa Cox & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "An anatomical comparison of fake-news and trusted-news sharing pattern on Twitter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 109-133, June.
    14. Julia Cagé & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2020. "The Production of Information in an Online World," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 87(5), pages 2126-2164.
    15. Mignot Sarah & Pellizzari Paolo & Westerhoff Frank, 2024. "Fake News and Asset Price Dynamics," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 244(4), pages 351-379.
    16. Maurizio Pugno, 2024. "Social media effects on well‐being: The hypothesis of addiction of a new variety," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(3), pages 690-704, August.
    17. Zazli Lily Wisker & Robert Neil McKie, 2021. "The effect of fake news on anger and negative word-of-mouth: moderating roles of religiosity and conservatism," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(2), pages 144-153, June.
    18. Roger D. Magarey & Christina M. Trexler, 2020. "Information: a missing component in understanding and mitigating social epidemics," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. McNamara, Trent & Mosquera, Roberto, 2024. "The political divide: The case of expectations and preferences," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Denter, Philipp & Ginzburg, Boris, 2021. "Troll Farms and Voter Disinformation," MPRA Paper 109634, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1587-1604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.