IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v37y2025i6p1560-1586.html

Layout Optimization for a Large-Scale Grid-Connected Solar Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Wang

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; and Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Qinghua Wu

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Kai Pan

    (Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Zuo-Jun Max Shen

    (College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; and Faculty of Engineering and Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

A solar power plant provides green electricity to the public via a power grid. As governments worldwide have pledged to reduce carbon emissions and achieve carbon neutrality, large-scale grid-connected solar power plants are booming. Developing such a plant requires significant investment, a large proportion of which covers construction costs. Such costs, together with the energy yield, critically depend on the plant’s layout. The layout planning of a solar power plant involves a series of complex optimization problems such as district partitioning, photovoltaic (PV) component location, and cable routing problems in a solar power plant. These problems have received limited attention in the literature and are highly challenging because they involve large-scale instances, complex design principles, and complicated physical constraints. Motivated by our collaborative projects with an electrical engineering company in China, this paper specifically focuses on the integrated location and routing (ILR) problem, which involves locating service ways, inverters, combiner boxes, and routing cables to connect them. We develop exact algorithms to effectively solve the ILR problem via a decomposition framework (leading to a variant of Benders decomposition (BD)), which is proven to produce an optimal solution. We also develop an exact branch-and-cut scheme to solve each subproblem in the decomposition framework by incorporating cutting planes and separation algorithms. Our solution approach is evaluated on 50 real-world data instances via extensive numerical experiments. Compared with the manual method based on greedy heuristics used in practice, our approach reduces the total cost by approximately 20%. Our decomposition method also achieves an average gap of 0.02% between the obtained lower and upper bounds, significantly smaller than the 16.08% gap achieved with the traditional BD.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Wang & Qinghua Wu & Kai Pan & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2025. "Layout Optimization for a Large-Scale Grid-Connected Solar Power Plant," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 1560-1586, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1560-1586
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastián Moreno & Jordi Pereira & Wilfredo Yushimito, 2020. "A hybrid K-means and integer programming method for commercial territory design: a case study in meat distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 87-117, March.
    2. Matteo Fischetti & Ivana Ljubić & Markus Sinnl, 2017. "Redesigning Benders Decomposition for Large-Scale Facility Location," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2146-2162, July.
    3. Kahr, Michael & Leitner, Markus & Ruthmair, Mario & Sinnl, Markus, 2021. "Benders decomposition for competitive influence maximization in (social) networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. David S. Johnson & Cecilia R. Aragon & Lyle A. McGeoch & Catherine Schevon, 1989. "Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I, Graph Partitioning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 865-892, December.
    5. Alexander Butsch & Jörg Kalcsics & Gilbert Laporte, 2014. "Districting for Arc Routing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 809-824, November.
    6. Camacho-Collados, M. & Liberatore, F. & Angulo, J.M., 2015. "A multi-criteria Police Districting Problem for the efficient and effective design of patrol sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 674-684.
    7. Quentin Botton & Bernard Fortz & Luis Gouveia & Michael Poss, 2013. "Benders Decomposition for the Hop-Constrained Survivable Network Design Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 13-26, February.
    8. S. W. Hess & J. B. Weaver & H. J. Siegfeldt & J. N. Whelan & P. A. Zitlau, 1965. "Nonpartisan Political Redistricting by Computer," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 998-1006, December.
    9. Castellano, Nuria Novas & Gázquez Parra, José Antonio & Valls-Guirado, Juan & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2015. "Optimal displacement of photovoltaic array’s rows using a novel shading model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Nikzad, Erfaneh & Bashiri, Mahdi & Abbasi, Babak, 2021. "A matheuristic algorithm for stochastic home health care planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 753-774.
    11. Aronescu, A. & Appelbaum, J., 2017. "Design optimization of photovoltaic solar fields-insight and methodology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 882-893.
    12. Verónica Arredondo & Miguel Martínez-Panero & Teresa Peña & Federica Ricca, 2021. "Mathematical political districting taking care of minority groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 375-402, October.
    13. Zeyad Kassem & Adolfo R. Escobedo, 2023. "Models and network insights for edge-based districting with simultaneous location-allocation decisions," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 768-780, August.
    14. Wang, Dian & Zhao, Jun & D’Ariano, Andrea & Peng, Qiyuan, 2021. "Simultaneous node and link districting in transportation networks: Model, algorithms and railway application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 73-94.
    15. Paul Bergey & Cliff Ragsdale & Mangesh Hoskote, 2003. "A Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm for the Electrical Power Districting Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 33-55, July.
    16. Hamidreza Validi & Austin Buchanan & Eugene Lykhovyd, 2022. "Imposing Contiguity Constraints in Political Districting Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 867-892, March.
    17. El-Sebaii, A.A. & Al-Hazmi, F.S. & Al-Ghamdi, A.A. & Yaghmour, S.J., 2010. "Global, direct and diffuse solar radiation on horizontal and tilted surfaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 568-576, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diglio, Antonio & Peiró, Juanjo & Piccolo, Carmela & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2023. "Approximation schemes for districting problems with probabilistic constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 233-248.
    2. Baghersad, Milad & Emadikhiav, Mohsen & Huang, C. Derrick & Behara, Ravi S., 2023. "Modularity maximization to design contiguous policy zones for pandemic response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 99-112.
    3. Diglio, Antonio & Peiró, Juanjo & Piccolo, Carmela & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Solutions for districting problems with chance-constrained balancing requirements," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Antonio Diglio & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama, 2020. "Towards a stochastic programming modeling framework for districting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 249-285, September.
    5. Maral Shahmizad & Austin Buchanan, 2025. "Political Districting to Minimize County Splits," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 752-774, March.
    6. Pietro Belotti & Austin Buchanan & Soraya Ezazipour, 2025. "Political Districting to Optimize the Polsby-Popper Compactness Score with Application to Voting Rights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2330-2350, September.
    7. Sebastián Moreno & Jordi Pereira & Wilfredo Yushimito, 2020. "A hybrid K-means and integer programming method for commercial territory design: a case study in meat distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 87-117, March.
    8. Maher, Stephen J., 2021. "Implementing the branch-and-cut approach for a general purpose Benders’ decomposition framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 479-498.
    9. Filippi, C. & Guastaroba, G. & Speranza, M.G., 2021. "On single-source capacitated facility location with cost and fairness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 959-974.
    10. Jörg Kalcsics & Stefan Nickel & Michael Schröder, 2005. "Towards a unified territorial design approach — Applications, algorithms and GIS integration," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(1), pages 1-56, June.
    11. Alexander Butsch & Jörg Kalcsics & Gilbert Laporte, 2014. "Districting for Arc Routing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 809-824, November.
    12. Kahr, Michael, 2022. "Determining locations and layouts for parcel lockers to support supply chain viability at the last mile," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Rodrigo, Pedro M. & Mouhib, Elmehdi & Fernandez, Eduardo F. & Almonacid, Florencia & Rosas-Caro, Julio C., 2024. "Comprehensive ground coverage analysis of large-scale fixed-tilt bifacial photovoltaic plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Fernando Tavares-Pereira & José Figueira & Vincent Mousseau & Bernard Roy, 2007. "Multiple criteria districting problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 69-92, October.
    15. Liu, Kanglin & Yang, Liu & Zhao, Yejia & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2023. "Multi-period stochastic programming for relief delivery considering evolving transportation network and temporary facility relocation/closure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    16. Mustafa C. Camur & Thomas Sharkey & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2022. "The Star Degree Centrality Problem: A Decomposition Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 93-112, January.
    17. Adam P. Schmidt & Duncan Buell & Laura A. Albert, 2024. "Optimal Consolidation of Polling Locations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 1028-1042, May.
    18. Arevalo-Ascanio, Rafael & De Meyer, Annelies & Gevaers, Roel & Guisson, Ruben & Dewulf, Wouter, 2024. "From operational to strategic modelling: A continuous multi-scale approach for last-mile analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Zetina, Carlos Armando & Contreras, Ivan & Fernández, Elena & Luna-Mota, Carlos, 2019. "Solving the optimum communication spanning tree problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 108-117.
    20. Appelbaum, Joseph & Aronescu, Avi, 2022. "Inter-row spacing calculation in photovoltaic fields - A new approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 387-394.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1560-1586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.