IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v37y2025i4p977-997.html

Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming and Constraint Programming Approaches for Assembly Line Balancing Problems with Setups

Author

Listed:
  • Jiachen Zhang

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

  • J. Christopher Beck

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

Abstract

We propose domain-independent dynamic programming (DIDP) and constraint programming (CP) models to exactly solve type 1 and type 2 assembly line balancing problem with sequence-dependent setup times (SUALBPs). The goal is to assign tasks to assembly stations and to sequence these tasks within each station while satisfying precedence relations specified between a subset of task pairs. Each task has a given processing time and a setup time dependent on the previous task on the station to which the task is assigned. The sum of the processing and setup times of tasks assigned to each station constitute the station time and the maximum station time is called the cycle time. For the type 1 SUALBP (SUALBP-1), the objective is to minimize the number of stations, given a maximum cycle time. For the type 2 SUALBP (SUALBP-2), the objective is to minimize the cycle time, given the number of stations. On a set of diverse SUALBP instances, experimental results show that our approaches significantly outperform the state-of-the-art mixed integer programming models for SUALBP-1. For SUALBP-2, the DIDP model outperforms the state-of-the-art exact approach based on logic-based Benders decomposition. By closing 76 open instances for SUALBP-2, our results demonstrate the promise of DIDP for solving complex planning and scheduling problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiachen Zhang & J. Christopher Beck, 2025. "Domain-Independent Dynamic Programming and Constraint Programming Approaches for Assembly Line Balancing Problems with Setups," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 977-997, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:977-997
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2024.0603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Funda Güner & Abdül K. Görür & Benhür Satır & Levent Kandiller & John. H. Drake, 2024. "A constraint programming approach to a real-world workforce scheduling problem for multi-manned assembly lines with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(9), pages 3212-3229, May.
    2. Andres, Carlos & Miralles, Cristobal & Pastor, Rafael, 2008. "Balancing and scheduling tasks in assembly lines with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1212-1223, June.
    3. Armin Scholl & Robert Klein, 1997. "SALOME: A Bidirectional Branch-and-Bound Procedure for Assembly Line Balancing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 319-334, November.
    4. Hassan Zohali & Bahman Naderi & Vahid Roshanaei, 2022. "Solving the Type-2 Assembly Line Balancing with Setups Using Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 315-332, January.
    5. Wucheng Yang & Wenming Cheng, 2020. "Modelling and solving mixed-model two-sided assembly line balancing problem with sequence-dependent setup time," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(21), pages 6638-6659, November.
    6. John N. Hooker, 2002. "Logic, Optimization, and Constraint Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 295-321, November.
    7. Alexander Bockmayr & Thomas Kasper, 1998. "Branch and Infer: A Unifying Framework for Integer and Finite Domain Constraint Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 287-300, August.
    8. Akpinar, Sener & Elmi, Atabak & Bektaş, Tolga, 2017. "Combinatorial Benders cuts for assembly line balancing problems with setups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 527-537.
    9. Bukchin, Yossi & Raviv, Tal, 2018. "Constraint programming for solving various assembly line balancing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 57-68.
    10. Scholl, Armin & Klein, Robert, 1997. "SALOME. a bidirectional branch and bound procedure for assembly line balancing," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 7890, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Rasul Esmaeilbeigi & Bahman Naderi & Parisa Charkhgard, 2016. "New formulations for the setup assembly line balancing and scheduling problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 493-518, March.
    12. Morrison, David R. & Sewell, Edward C. & Jacobson, Sheldon H., 2014. "An application of the branch, bound, and remember algorithm to a new simple assembly line balancing dataset," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 403-409.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    2. Hassan Zohali & Bahman Naderi & Vahid Roshanaei, 2022. "Solving the Type-2 Assembly Line Balancing with Setups Using Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 315-332, January.
    3. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Dian Huang & Zhaofang Mao & Kan Fang & Enyuan Fu & Michael L. Pinedo, 2025. "An Improved Combinatorial Benders Decomposition Algorithm for the Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Line Balancing Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 1267-1283, September.
    5. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    6. Li, Zixiang & Kucukkoc, Ibrahim & Zhang, Zikai, 2020. "Branch, bound and remember algorithm for two-sided assembly line balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 896-905.
    7. Michels, Adalberto Sato & Lopes, Thiago Cantos & Magatão, Leandro, 2020. "An exact method with decomposition techniques and combinatorial Benders’ cuts for the type-2 multi-manned assembly line balancing problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    8. Bukchin, Yossi & Raviv, Tal, 2018. "Constraint programming for solving various assembly line balancing problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 57-68.
    9. Raphael Kramer & Mauro Dell’Amico & Manuel Iori, 2017. "A batching-move iterated local search algorithm for the bin packing problem with generalized precedence constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6288-6304, November.
    10. Otto, Alena & Otto, Christian & Scholl, Armin, 2013. "Systematic data generation and test design for solution algorithms on the example of SALBPGen for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 33-45.
    11. Michels, Adalberto Sato & Lopes, Thiago Cantos & Sikora, Celso Gustavo Stall & Magatão, Leandro, 2019. "A Benders’ decomposition algorithm with combinatorial cuts for the multi-manned assembly line balancing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 796-808.
    12. Sternatz, Johannes, 2014. "Enhanced multi-Hoffmann heuristic for efficiently solving real-world assembly line balancing problems in automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 740-754.
    13. Pape, Tom, 2015. "Heuristics and lower bounds for the simple assembly line balancing problem type 1: Overview, computational tests and improvements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 32-42.
    14. Walter, Rico & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2021. "SALSA: Combining branch-and-bound with dynamic programming to smoothen workloads in simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 857-873.
    15. García-Villoria, Alberto & Corominas, Albert & Nadal, Adrià & Pastor, Rafael, 2018. "Solving the accessibility windows assembly line problem level 1 and variant 1 (AWALBP-L1-1) with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 882-895.
    16. Scholl, Armin & Becker, Christian, 2006. "State-of-the-art exact and heuristic solution procedures for simple assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 666-693, February.
    17. Diefenbach, Johannes & Stolletz, Raik, 2022. "Stochastic assembly line balancing: General bounds and reliability-based branch-and-bound algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 589-605.
    18. Tallys Yunes & Ionuţ D. Aron & J. N. Hooker, 2010. "An Integrated Solver for Optimization Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 342-356, April.
    19. Karabati, Selcuk & Sayin, Serpil, 2003. "Assembly line balancing in a mixed-model sequencing environment with synchronous transfers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 417-429, September.
    20. Armin Scholl & Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner, 2009. "Optimally solving the alternative subgraphs assembly line balancing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 243-258, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:977-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.