IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v37y2025i4p1087-1105.html

Simulating Confidence Intervals for Conditional Value-at-Risk via Least-Squares Metamodels

Author

Listed:
  • Qidong Lai

    (Department of Management Sciences, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Guangwu Liu

    (Department of Management Sciences, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Bingfeng Zhang

    (SAFE Investment Company Limited, Central, Hong Kong)

  • Kun Zhang

    (Institute of Statistics and Big Data, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

Metamodeling techniques have been applied to approximate portfolio loss as a function of financial risk factors, thus producing point estimates of various measures of portfolio risk based on Monte Carlo samples. Rather than point estimates, this paper focuses on the construction of confidence intervals (CIs) for a widely used risk measure, the so-called conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), when the least-squares method (LSM) is employed as a metamodel in the point estimation. To do so, we first develop lower and upper bounds of CVaR and construct CIs for these bounds. Then, the lower end of the CI for the lower bound and the upper end of the CI for the upper bound together form a CI of CVaR with justifiable statistical guarantee, which accounts for both the metamodel error and the noises of Monte Carlo samples. The proposed CI procedure reuses the samples simulated for LSM point estimation, thus requiring no additional simulation budget. We demonstrate via numerical examples that the proposed procedure may lead to a CI with the desired coverage probability and a much smaller width than that of an existing CI in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Qidong Lai & Guangwu Liu & Bingfeng Zhang & Kun Zhang, 2025. "Simulating Confidence Intervals for Conditional Value-at-Risk via Least-Squares Metamodels," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 1087-1105, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:1087-1105
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0394
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leif Andersen & Mark Broadie, 2004. "Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1222-1234, September.
    2. Trindade, A. Alexandre & Uryasev, Stan & Shapiro, Alexander & Zrazhevsky, Grigory, 2007. "Financial prediction with constrained tail risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 3524-3538, November.
    3. Michael B. Gordy & Sandeep Juneja, 2010. "Nested Simulation in Portfolio Risk Measurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1833-1848, October.
    4. Bruce Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2010. "Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 371-382, April.
    5. Hai Lan & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2010. "A Confidence Interval Procedure for Expected Shortfall Risk Measurement via Two-Level Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1481-1490, October.
    6. Denis Belomestny & Christian Bender & John Schoenmakers, 2009. "True Upper Bounds For Bermudan Products Via Non‐Nested Monte Carlo," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 53-71, January.
    7. John C. Duchi & Peter W. Glynn & Hongseok Namkoong, 2021. "Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 946-969, August.
    8. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    9. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2015. "Risk Estimation via Regression," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    10. Martin B. Haugh & Leonid Kogan, 2004. "Pricing American Options: A Duality Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(2), pages 258-270, April.
    11. Yunpeng Sun & Daniel W. Apley & Jeremy Staum, 2011. "Efficient Nested Simulation for Estimating the Variance of a Conditional Expectation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 998-1007, August.
    12. Helin Zhu & Fan Ye & Enlu Zhou, 2015. "Fast estimation of true bounds on Bermudan option prices under jump-diffusion processes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(11), pages 1885-1900, November.
    13. L. Jeff Hong & Guangwu Liu, 2009. "Simulating Sensitivities of Conditional Value at Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 281-293, February.
    14. L. C. G. Rogers, 2002. "Monte Carlo valuation of American options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 271-286, July.
    15. Kun Zhang & Guangwu Liu & Shiyu Wang, 2022. "Technical Note—Bootstrap-based Budget Allocation for Nested Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1128-1142, March.
    16. Vijay V. Desai & Vivek F. Farias & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2012. "Pathwise Optimization for Optimal Stopping Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2292-2308, December.
    17. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Guangwu Liu, 2017. "Kernel Smoothing for Nested Estimation with Application to Portfolio Risk Measurement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 657-673, June.
    18. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2011. "Efficient Risk Estimation via Nested Sequential Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1172-1194, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenjia Wang & Yanyuan Wang & Xiaowei Zhang, 2024. "Smooth Nested Simulation: Bridging Cubic and Square Root Convergence Rates in High Dimensions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 9031-9057, December.
    2. Kun Zhang & Guangwu Liu & Shiyu Wang, 2022. "Technical Note—Bootstrap-based Budget Allocation for Nested Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1128-1142, March.
    3. Kun Zhang & Ben Mingbin Feng & Guangwu Liu & Shiyu Wang, 2022. "Sample Recycling for Nested Simulation with Application in Portfolio Risk Measurement," Papers 2203.15929, arXiv.org.
    4. Wang, Tianxiang & Xu, Jie & Hu, Jian-Qiang & Chen, Chun-Hung, 2023. "Efficient estimation of a risk measure requiring two-stage simulation optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1355-1365.
    5. Domagoj Demeterfi & Kathrin Glau & Linus Wunderlich, 2025. "Function approximations for counterparty credit exposure calculations," Papers 2507.09004, arXiv.org.
    6. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    7. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    8. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    9. Helin Zhu & Fan Ye & Enlu Zhou, 2013. "Fast Estimation of True Bounds on Bermudan Option Prices under Jump-diffusion Processes," Papers 1305.4321, arXiv.org.
    10. Runhuan Feng & Peng Li, 2021. "Sample Recycling Method -- A New Approach to Efficient Nested Monte Carlo Simulations," Papers 2106.06028, arXiv.org.
    11. Ben Mingbin Feng & Eunhye Song, 2025. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 723-742, May.
    12. Mark Broadie & Weiwei Shen, 2016. "High-Dimensional Portfolio Optimization With Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-49, June.
    13. Dang, Ou & Feng, Mingbin & Hardy, Mary R., 2023. "Two-stage nested simulation of tail risk measurement: A likelihood ratio approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-24.
    14. Denis Belomestny & John Schoenmakers, 2021. "From optimal martingales to randomized dual optimal stopping," Papers 2102.01533, arXiv.org.
    15. Liu, Xiaoyu & Yan, Xing & Zhang, Kun, 2024. "Kernel quantile estimators for nested simulation with application to portfolio value-at-risk measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1168-1177.
    16. Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Nikolaus Schweizer & Mitja Stadje, 2025. "Robust Multiple Stopping—A Duality Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 1250-1276, May.
    17. Guo Liang & Kun Zhang & Jun Luo, 2024. "A FAST Method for Nested Estimation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 1481-1500, December.
    18. Helin Zhu & Tianyi Liu & Enlu Zhou, 2015. "Risk Quantification in Stochastic Simulation under Input Uncertainty," Papers 1507.06015, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    19. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Guangwu Liu, 2017. "Kernel Smoothing for Nested Estimation with Application to Portfolio Risk Measurement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 657-673, June.
    20. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen & Timo Welti, 2019. "Solving high-dimensional optimal stopping problems using deep learning," Papers 1908.01602, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:1087-1105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.