IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v37y2025i3p723-742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Mingbin Feng

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Eunhye Song

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

In the nested simulation literature, a common assumption is that the experimenter can choose the number of outer scenarios to sample. This paper considers the case when the experimenter is given a fixed set of outer scenarios from an external entity. We propose a nested simulation experiment design that pools inner replications from one scenario to estimate another scenario’s conditional mean via the likelihood ratio method. Given the outer scenarios, we decide how many inner replications to run at each outer scenario as well as how to pool the inner replications by solving a bilevel optimization problem that minimizes the total simulation effort. We provide asymptotic analyses on the convergence rates of the performance measure estimators computed from the optimized experiment design. Under some assumptions, the optimized design achieves O ( Γ − 1 ) mean squared error of the estimators given simulation budget Γ . Numerical experiments demonstrate that our design outperforms a state-of-the-art design that pools replications via regression.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Mingbin Feng & Eunhye Song, 2025. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 723-742, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:723-742
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.0392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0392
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:723-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.