IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ine/journl/v60y2025i69p5-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A primary assessment of the EU regions' transition towards bioeconomy

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Maroulis

    (University Research Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources-Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece)

  • Panos Kalimeris

    (University Research Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources-Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece)

  • Panagiotis Koronaios

    (University Research Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources-Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece)

  • Antonios Rovolis

    (University Research Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources-Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Objective:The European Union (EU) identifies the deployment of bioeconomy as the key factor to achieve a sustainable future. This is expected to be realized through the decarbonization of the economy and the replacement of all resources with renewables ones. The importance is also acknowledged on the EU Member State level, as there are currently ten EU member states with dedicated bioeconomy strategies and seven that are in the process of developing theirs. However, there is still more to be done on a regional level, because only 28 EU regions have in place their own dedicated bioeconomy strategies and 69 other EU regions are in the process or are implementing strategies in which the bioeconomy is one of the key elements. In any case, it has been highlighted how important and crucial the integration of bioeconomy in regional economies is. The main objective of the study is to assess and promote the transition to bioeconomy on a regional scale by analysing EU regions (NUTS II Level) with a group of selected bio-indicators. The outcome will be a better understanding of bioeconomy at a regional level. Moreover, the proposed tool could be used as a policy instrument to achieve regional development based on the unique characteristics and the comparative advantage of each region. Method: A Multi-Criteria Assessment (MCA) tool is designed and implemented. Specifically, the process that will be followed includes the conduct of an extensive review of the existing world-wide indicators, national frameworks and methodologies based on academic literature, reports, guidelines, and relevant projects. The outcome of this process is a pool-database with the most utilized bioeconomy indicators. Furthermore, these indicators are categorized in economic, social, and environmental groups, reflecting the three pillars of sustainable development. The proposed indicators are eliminated if they do not fulfil specific criteria. The selection criteria will be the meaningfulness and clear meaning i.e., description of an indicator, existence of an indicator in other policy frameworks, data availability, extended geographical coverage, comparability across countries/products or sectors, comparability over time and accessibility of data. Eventually, the final group of the remaining proposed indicators is selected based on data availability and applicability in all EU-regions. Finally, regions are ranked accordingly by using the TOPSIS MCA tool. Results: The selected bioeconomy indicators will be used to assess, initially, the current regional bioeconomy state for the eight countries-members of the consortium of the Horizon 2020 “BIO2REG†project, namely, Germany, Spain, Greece, Belgium, France, Sweden, Czech Republic, and Iceland. This initial assessment will provide the blueprint for revealing the model bioeconomy regions and the potential EU-wide pathways to promote regional bioeconomy. Originality: To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to provide an assessment of NUTS II regions based on bioeconomy- related indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Maroulis & Panos Kalimeris & Panagiotis Koronaios & Antonios Rovolis, 2025. "A primary assessment of the EU regions' transition towards bioeconomy," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 60(1(69)), pages 5-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ine:journl:v:60:y:2025:i:69:p:5-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revecon.ro/articles/2025-1/2025-1-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus M. Bugge & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2016. "What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    3. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    4. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    5. Prem Chandra Pandey & Manish Pandey, 2023. "Highlighting the role of agriculture and geospatial technology in food security and sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3175-3195, October.
    6. Daniel Adrian Gârdan & Mihai Andronie & Iuliana Petronela Gârdan & Irina Elena Andronie & Mariana Iatagan & Iulian Hurloiu, 2018. "Bioeconomy Development and Using of Intellectual Capital for the Creation of Competitive Advantages by SMEs in the Field of Biotechnology," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 647-647, August.
    7. Tina Highfill & Matthew Chambers, 2023. "Developing a National Measure of the Economic Contributions of the Bioeconomy," BEA Working Papers 0206, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    8. Simen Pedersen & Kristin E. Gangås & Madhu Chetri & Harry P. Andreassen, 2020. "Economic Gain vs. Ecological Pain—Environmental Sustainability in Economies Based on Renewable Biological Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Khushbu Kumari & Raushan Kumar & Nirmali Bordoloi & Tatiana Minkina & Chetan Keswani & Kuldeep Bauddh, 2023. "Unravelling the Recent Developments in the Production Technology and Efficient Applications of Biochar for Agro-Ecosystems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Neagu Olimpia & Dumiter Florin & Braica Alexandra & Jimon Ștefania & David Gabriela, 2019. "The Correlation Between Human Capital and Gross Added Value in the Bioeconomy Sectors at the European Union (EU) Country Level," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Altenburg, Tilman & Bauer, Steffen & Brandi, Clara & Brüntrup, Michael & Malerba, Daniele & Never, Babette & Pegels, Anna & Stamm, Andreas & To, Jenny & Volz, Ulrich, 2022. "Ökologische Strukturpolitik: Ein starker Profilbaustein für die deutsche Entwicklungszusammenarbeit," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Dan Costin Nițescu & Valentin Murgu, 2020. "The Bioeconomy and Foreign Trade in Food Products—A Sustainable Partnership at the European Level?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Wiebke Jander & Sven Wydra & Johann Wackerbauer & Philipp Grundmann & Stephan Piotrowski, 2020. "Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Sophie Urmetzer & Michael P. Schlaile & Kristina B. Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Andreas Pyka, 2018. "Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Ayrapetyan, David & Hermans, Frans, 2020. "Introducing a multiscalar framework for biocluster research: A meta-analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(9).
    17. Raizza Miranda & Markus Schwaninger & Alvimar Lucena & Ygor Logullo & Mischel Carmen N. Belderrain & Tereza C. M. B. Carvalho & Renato C. Sato, 2023. "Sustainable Amazon: A Systemic Inquiry with Native Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    20. Vargas-Hernández José G. & Rakowska Joanna & Vargas-González Omar C., 2022. "Green Economic Development as the Framework for Green Finance and Green Investment," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 304-322, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ine:journl:v:60:y:2025:i:69:p:5-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentina Vasile (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.