IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ime/imemes/v39y2021p55-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Security Risks of Machine Learning Systems and Taxonomy Based on the Failure Mode Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kazutoshi Kan

    (Director, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan(E-mail: kazutoshi.kan@boj.or.jp))

Abstract

This paper clarifies the source of difficulties in machine learning security and determines the usefulness of the failure mode approach for capturing security risks of machine learning systems comprehensively. Machine learning is an inductive methodology that automatically extracts relationships among data from a huge number of input-output samples. Recently, machine learning systems have been implemented deeply in various IT systems and their social impact has been increasing. However, machine learning models have specific vulnerabilities and relevant security risks that conventional IT systems do not have. An overall picture regarding these vulnerabilities and risks has not been clarified sufficiently, and there has been no consensus about their taxonomy. Thus, this paper reveals the specificity of the security risks and describes machine learning models' failure modes hierarchically by classifying them on three axes, i.e., (1) presence or absence of attacker's intention, (2) location of vulnerabilities, and (3) functional characteristics to be lost. This paper also considers points for future utilization of machine learning in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazutoshi Kan, 2021. "Security Risks of Machine Learning Systems and Taxonomy Based on the Failure Mode Approach," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 39, pages 55-76, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ime:imemes:v:39:y:2021:p:55-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/me39-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ime:imemes:v:39:y:2021:p:55-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kinken (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.