IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A more efficient sampling procedure, using loaded probabilities

Listed author(s):
  • J. Richard Cumpston


    (JR Cumpston Pty Ltd, 1 Talbot Street Forrest ACT, Australia 2603)

Registered author(s):

    All-case simulation, where demographic outcomes are simulated for each person each simulation cycle, has been used in almost every national household microsimulation model. This paper suggests the use of simulation by stratified sampling with loaded probabilities. This suggestion is intended to provide faster simulations, particularly when using simulation cycle times much shorter than a year. The paper derives optimal formulas for draw numbers and loaded probabilities, and uses stochastic simulations to show that sampling with loaded probabilities gives similar results to all-case simulation. Tests with a microsimulation model of 175,000 Australians show that sampling with loaded probabilities can reduce run times with yearly cycles by about 43%, and run times with weekly cycles by about 98%. A 50-year demographic projection took 34 seconds with a yearly cycle, and 54 seconds with a weekly cycle. Event numbers and standard deviations are comparable with those expected from risk profiles. The paper concludes that sampling with loaded probabilities is theoretically valid, can be much quicker than all-case simulation, and does give similar estimates. Potential applications are for large models, or those with short simulation cycles.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by International Microsimulation Association in its journal International Journal of Microsimulation.

    Volume (Year): 5 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 21-30

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:21-30
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jinjing Li)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.