IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v30y2017i2p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study of Technological Factors Affecting Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Njenga Kinuthia

    (Ferris State University, Big Rapids, MI, USA)

  • Sock Chung

    (Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA)

Abstract

The adoption of cloud enterprise resource planning (CERP) systems deserves serious attention from both the practitioner and academic communities. This study empirically investigated the relationships for organizations that adopted CERP systems and for average organizations which are interested in CERP system adoption based on three technological and one benefit factors: The study identified the relevant technological factors as relative advantage, compatibility and security concern over the system adoption. This study indicated that the three technological and one perceived benefit factors are significant predictors of CERP systems adoption. The findings of the study provide evidence that organizations with CERP systems have a higher level of the three technological factors and perceived benefits than the mean of each relevant factor for all organizations that are merely interested in adopting the systems. The study discusses practical and theoretical implications of the results, and provides a guide for CERP systems adoption and a basis for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Njenga Kinuthia & Sock Chung, 2017. "An Empirical Study of Technological Factors Affecting Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Adoption," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 30(2), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:30:y:2017:i:2:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IRMJ.2017040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:30:y:2017:i:2:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.