IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v26y2013i1p37-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Disciplinary Approach for the Risk Assessment Ontology Design

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Draghici

    (Department of Management, “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania)

  • George Draghici

    (Department of Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The article describes a cross-disciplinary approach to support the risk assessment process through an integrative tool based on a global ontology. The designed global ontology allows the risk identification and characterization, the related potential work accidents and/or diseases, and decides better for appropriate preventive/corrective measures (the risk assessment logical chain). The global ontology structure follow a matrix model with two dimensions: one related to the work system structure/components and the other related to the risk assessment logical chain. For the integrative tools, solutions there have been developed a risk assessment process modeling with the purpose of better explain and understand the relations in the risk assessment logical chain. In addition, a concept model was developed and implemented for the global ontology complete definition. Finally, an expert system and a web platform are presented as integrative tools for the risk assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Draghici & George Draghici, 2013. "Cross-Disciplinary Approach for the Risk Assessment Ontology Design," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 26(1), pages 37-53, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:37-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.2013010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:37-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.