IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v26y2013i1p12-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why a Partner Ecosystem Results in Superior Value: A Comparative Analysis of the Business Models of Two ERP Vendors

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle C. Antero

    (Department of IT Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark)

  • Niels Bjørn-Andersen

    (Department of IT Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark)

Abstract

The paper carries out a historical analysis of business conducted over 25 years by two enterprise resource planning (ERP) software vendors in Denmark-Maconomy and Navision-each employing its own business model. Maconomy adopted a business model where the company itself would develop, sell, and implement ERP packages directly to its customers; whereas, Navision adopted a business model which relied on an ecosystem of partners consisting of value added resellers (VAR) and independent software vendors (ISV). Using the Resource Based View (RBV), the paper compared and contrasted the capabilities and resources of the two companies. The key finding is that Navision provided superior customer value and, consequently, collected superior rent, as shown by its selling price of as much as 16 times the selling price of Maconomy. The analysis shows that the main reason for this huge difference is the value of Navision’s ecosystem, which had enabled the company to achieve substantial economies of scale. This finding has implications far beyond the ERP field. The results of the study point to this direction: Technology will lead to more intermediation and the inclusion of more economic units in the traditional value chain or value network due to lower transaction costs and increased focus on core competences.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle C. Antero & Niels Bjørn-Andersen, 2013. "Why a Partner Ecosystem Results in Superior Value: A Comparative Analysis of the Business Models of Two ERP Vendors," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 26(1), pages 12-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:12-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.2013010102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:26:y:2013:i:1:p:12-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.