IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v22y2009i4p45-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mandatory Usage of Mobile IS by Unsophisticated Users: Welfare and Compatibility with Work

Author

Listed:
  • Yong-Young Kim

    (Temple University, USA)

  • Hee-Dong Yang

    (Ewha Womans University, Korea)

  • JoongHo Ahn

    (Seoul National University, Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates the factors that influence the user’s (postal workers’) welfare in using personal digital assistants (PDAs) that were implemented by mandate in the Korea Postal Services (KPS). The authors propose to expand our perspective towards users’ welfare that becomes vulnerable when information systems (IS) are implemented by mandate, and suggest user satisfaction with IS as the appropriate measure of success. The authors are especially interested in the mandatory introduction and implementation of IS in organizations where users of such information systems are unsophisticated with limited educational background or IS experience, and whose job is relatively simple and labor-intensive. They hypothesized that information quality, system quality, and perceived usefulness are important factors for user satisfaction with mandatory IS. They also found that compatibility with work is a critical mediator through which the independent variables make significant influence on user satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong-Young Kim & Hee-Dong Yang & JoongHo Ahn, 2009. "Mandatory Usage of Mobile IS by Unsophisticated Users: Welfare and Compatibility with Work," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 22(4), pages 45-63, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:22:y:2009:i:4:p:45-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.2009061903
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:22:y:2009:i:4:p:45-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.