IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jwltt0/v11y2016i3p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EFL Learners' Perceptions of Blog Assignments and Instructors' E-Feedbacks

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Aliakbari

    (Ilam University, Ilam, Iran)

  • Saeedeh Mohammadi

    (Ilam University, Ilam, Iran)

Abstract

The use of blogs in EFL settings considerably supports learner-centered interactive learning and constructivist environments. Moreover, using blogs to provide instructor's feedback has a crucial role in the language learning process. The present study aimed to explore Iranian EFL learners' perceptions of blog assignments and instructor's e-feedbacks thereof. To this end, assignments were established and teacher's feedbacks were transmitted via the blogs for a period of one educational semester. Data were triangulated and collected using think-aloud protocols and reflexive journals during the semester, as well as semi-structured interviews at the end. Data analysis through grounded theory further revealed six major categories: educational effects, psychological effects, technological effects, social effects, teacher's traditional feedbacks vs. e-feedbacks, and students' preferences of e-feedbacks. Accordingly, implications are discussed in light of EFL settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Aliakbari & Saeedeh Mohammadi, 2016. "EFL Learners' Perceptions of Blog Assignments and Instructors' E-Feedbacks," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJWLTT.2016070101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.