IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v17y2021i2p79-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientific Online Communication: The Strategic Landscape of ResearchGate Users

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Khvatova

    (Emlyon Business School, Ecully, France)

  • Svetlana Dushina

    (S. I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, St Petersburg Branch, RAS, Russia)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of research aimed at studying the interrelations of scientists' online communications and their real academic achievements using the example of ResearchGate (RG). The goals of the study are to discover the spectrum of communication practices of RG users and define the influence of institutional factors and demographic characteristics on the users' network activity. The sample consisting of 4800 RG profiles is composed using a web scraping approach. Cluster analysis of the data reveals three clusters of RG users according to these practices (‘representation' and ‘exchange'). The study found that neither age nor status influence the network activity. However, ranking the institutional affiliation of users demonstrated the influence of institutional factors on their network behaviour. The verified results of the present research essentially contribute to the understanding of how a scientist should use the advantages of the network in his/her professional activity, and how to overcome institutional limits which inhibit academic advancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Khvatova & Svetlana Dushina, 2021. "Scientific Online Communication: The Strategic Landscape of ResearchGate Users," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 17(2), pages 79-103, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:17:y:2021:i:2:p:79-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJTHI.2021040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:17:y:2021:i:2:p:79-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.