IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v15y2019i1p33-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral and Physiological Responses to Computers in the Ultimatum Game

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Swiderska

    (Department of Psychology, Warsaw University, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Eva G. Krumhuber

    (Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK)

  • Arvid Kappas

    (Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany)

Abstract

This article describes how studies in the area of decision-making suggest clear differences in behavioral responses to humans versus computers. The current objective was to investigate decision-making in an economic game played only with computer partners. In Experiment 1, participants were engaged in the ultimatum game with computer agents and regular computers while their physiological responses were recorded. In Experiment 2, an identical setup of the game was used, but the ethnicity of the computer agents was manipulated. As expected, almost all equitable monetary splits offered by the computer were accepted. The acceptance rates gradually decreased when the splits became less fair. Although the obtained behavioral pattern implied a reaction to violation of the rule of fairness by the computer in the game, no evidence was found for participants' corresponding emotional involvement. The findings contribute to the body of research on human-computer interaction and suggest that social effects of computers can be attenuated.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Swiderska & Eva G. Krumhuber & Arvid Kappas, 2019. "Behavioral and Physiological Responses to Computers in the Ultimatum Game," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 33-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:33-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJTHI.2019010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:15:y:2019:i:1:p:33-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.