IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v10y2014i2p21-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Website Aesthetics by Users and Designers: Implications for Evaluation Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Panayiotis Koutsabasis

    (Department of Product and Systems Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Syros, Greece)

  • Theano G. Istikopoulou

    (Department of Product and Systems Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Syros, Greece)

Abstract

The set up of practical methods for evaluation of website aesthetics from the user perspective and the provision of useful feedback to designers is an open issue in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The paper presents an evaluation study of aesthetic attributes of two websites from the user perspective and compares the results to the design team. The study initially involved the formulation of a set of aesthetic attributes and their appreciation by a user group of 111 users for two websites, following a traditional user testing approach. The user evaluation was then compared to the design team's appreciation of these aesthetic attributes for their own designs. The main results of this test was that: (a) the two groups have a similar view about the presence of a considerable number of the selected aesthetic attributes; (b) users have rated most aesthetic attributes significantly lower than designers; (c) different aesthetic attributes become important for different objects of study for both groups. The design team found the evaluation informative and inspiring; however they identified the need for further explanation of user responses in terms of suggested design patterns and examples. Also, a number of recommendations towards an evaluation method of aesthetics in HCI are identified and discussed

Suggested Citation

  • Panayiotis Koutsabasis & Theano G. Istikopoulou, 2014. "Perceived Website Aesthetics by Users and Designers: Implications for Evaluation Practice," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 21-34, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:21-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijthi.2014040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:10:y:2014:i:2:p:21-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.