IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jtd000/v4y2013i1p56-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing eLearning Systems Success: An Educators’ Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed E. Edrees

    (Computer Science Department, College of Information Technology, University of Bahrain, Sakhair, Bahrain)

Abstract

The traditional context of learning is experiencing a radical change. Along with the advancement of information technology, the electronic learning (eLearning) has played an important role in teaching and learning, which has become more and more popular not only in different levels of schools but also in various commercial or industrial companies. Measuring and evaluating eLearning systems have become a priority for both schools and commercial or industrial companies to justify investments, assess impacts, and better meet learner and teacher expectations. In context of eLearning, few studies have been conducted to assess the success of eLearning systems. This study provides the first empirical test for an adaption of Delone and McLean’s information systems success model considering both parts of the model, dimensions and relationships, to assess eLearning systems success from educators’ perspective. Data collected by questionnaire from 74 higher education educators that using eLearning systems in Bahrain was analyzed. Except for the link system quality to user satisfaction, the hypothesized relationships between the six success variables are significantly or marginally supported by the data. The findings show several important implications for eLearning research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed E. Edrees, 2013. "Assessing eLearning Systems Success: An Educators’ Perspective," International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 56-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jtd000:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:56-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jtd.2013010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jtd000:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:56-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.