IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jtd000/v1y2010i2p62-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Training Methods: Relative Effectiveness and Frequency of Use in the Malaysian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Veeriah Sinniah

    (University of Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Sharan Kaur

    (University of Malaya, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study comparatively examines the relative effectiveness and frequency of use of modern and conventional training methods, as much rhetoric has surrounded the use of techniques like distance learning and computer-based training methods. The responses from 200 employees suggest that no significant difference exists with respect to frequency of use, but a significant difference exists in terms of effectiveness. The result shows that on-the-job training (OJT) methods are widely used and are perceived as the most effective method, whereas distance learning is not widely used because it is perceived as less effective. This study also reveals that a significant difference exists between modern training methods and conventional training methods in terms of attaining training objectives. OJT is given the highest rating for attaining training objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Veeriah Sinniah & Sharan Kaur, 2010. "Electronic Training Methods: Relative Effectiveness and Frequency of Use in the Malaysian Context," International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 62-74, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jtd000:v:1:y:2010:i:2:p:62-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jtd.2010040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jtd000:v:1:y:2010:i:2:p:62-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.