IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jt0000/v3y2012i4p41-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Succulent Sins, Personalized Politics, and Mainstream Media’s Tabloidization Temptation

Author

Listed:
  • Jenn Burleson Mackay

    (Department of Communications, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA)

  • Erica Bailey

    (Department of Communication, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA)

Abstract

This study uses an experiment to analyze how mainstream journalism’s use of tabloid writing techniques affects online credibility. Participants read four news stories and rated their credibility using McCroskey’s Source Credibility Scale. Participants found stories written with a tabloid style less credible than more traditional stories. Tabloidized soft news stories were more credible than tabloidized hard news stories. Results suggest that online news media may damage their credibility by using tabloidized writing techniques to increase readership. Furthermore, participants were less likely to enjoy stories written in a tabloidized style. An application of act utilitarianism suggests that tabloidization is an unethical method for increasing news readership.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenn Burleson Mackay & Erica Bailey, 2012. "Succulent Sins, Personalized Politics, and Mainstream Media’s Tabloidization Temptation," International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 41-53, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:3:y:2012:i:4:p:41-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jte.2012100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:3:y:2012:i:4:p:41-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.