IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jswis0/v14y2018i2p138-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Ontology Ranking Models Based on the Ensemble Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Jie

    (College of Information Engineering, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China & Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China)

  • Yuan Kerou

    (College of Information Engineering, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China)

  • Zhou Jianshe

    (Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China)

  • Shi Jinsheng

    (Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Imaging Technology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China)

Abstract

This article describes how more knowledge appears on the Internet than in an ontological form. Displaying results to users precisely when searching is the key issue of the research on ontology retrieval. The considered factors of ontology ranking are not only limited to internal character-matching, but analysis of metadata, including the entities, structures and the relations in ontologies. Currently, existing single feature ranking algorithms focus on the structures, elements and the contents of a certain aspect in ontology, thus, the results are not satisfactory. Combining multiple single-featured models seems to achieve better results, but the objectivity and versatility of models' weights are debatable. Machine learning effectively solves the problem and putting advantages of ranking learning algorithms together is the pressing issue. So we propose ensemble learning strategies to combine different algorithms in ontology ranking. And the ranking result is more satisfied compared to Swoogle and base algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Jie & Yuan Kerou & Zhou Jianshe & Shi Jinsheng, 2018. "Study on Ontology Ranking Models Based on the Ensemble Learning," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 14(2), pages 138-161, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jswis0:v:14:y:2018:i:2:p:138-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSWIS.2018040107
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jswis0:v:14:y:2018:i:2:p:138-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.