Author
Listed:
- Brian Walshe
(ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology, Knowledge and Data Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland)
- Rob Brennan
(ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology, Knowledge and Data Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland)
- Declan O'Sullivan
(ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology, Knowledge and Data Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland)
Abstract
Linked Open Data consists of a large set of structured data knowledge bases which have been linked together, typically using equivalence statements. These equivalences usually take the form of owl:sameAs statements linking individuals, but links between classes are far less common. Often, the lack of linking between classes is because the relationships cannot be described as elementary one to one equivalences. Instead, complex correspondences referencing multiple entities in logical combinations are often necessary if we want to describe how the classes in one ontology are related to classes in a second ontology. In this paper the authors introduce a novel Bayesian Restriction Class Correspondence Estimation (Bayes-ReCCE) algorithm, an extensional approach to detecting complex correspondences between classes. Bayes-ReCCE operates by analysing features of matched individuals in the knowledge bases, and uses Bayesian inference to search for complex correspondences between the classes these individuals belong to. Bayes-ReCCE is designed to be capable of providing meaningful results even when only small amounts of matched instances are available. They demonstrate this capability empirically, showing that the complex correspondences generated by Bayes-ReCCE have a median F1 score of over 0.75 when compared against a gold standard set of complex correspondences between Linked Open Data knowledge bases covering the geographical and cinema domains. In addition, the authors discuss how metadata produced by Bayes-ReCCE can be included in the correspondences to encourage reuse by allowing users to make more informed decisions on the meaning of the relationship described in the correspondences.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jswis0:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:25-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.