IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jskd00/v8y2016i1p44-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Venting Negative Emotions on Twitter and The Number of Followers and Followees

Author

Listed:
  • Yeslam Al-Saggaf

    (School of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia)

  • Sonja Utz

    (Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien & University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany)

  • Ruoyun Lin

    (Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

Do people who express negative feelings (loneliness, sadness) on Twitter gain or lose online contacts? To answer this question, the authors tracked the number of followers and followees of people who tweeted about loneliness or sadness twice; once when they expressed the negative feeling and a second time five months later. The authors compared the networks of those users with the networks of others who either simply retweeted tweets about loneliness/sadness or (re)tweeted about the corresponding positive feelings. People expressing loneliness in their tweets, as well as people expressing sadness in their tweets had smaller networks than people expressing feeling loved or happy. This effect held only for the original tweets, not retweets, and was – in case of sad/happy – stronger for the followees than the followers. Moreover, the authors found that people expressing loneliness also had smaller friends' networks five months later than the people expressing feeling loved, and that the networks of the people expressing sadness became even smaller during the following five months.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeslam Al-Saggaf & Sonja Utz & Ruoyun Lin, 2016. "Venting Negative Emotions on Twitter and The Number of Followers and Followees," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pages 44-55, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:44-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSKD.2016010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:44-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.