IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jskd00/v3y2011i4p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boundary Critique and Stakeholder Collaboration in Open Source Software Migration: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Osden Jokonya

    (University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa)

  • Stan Hardman

    (University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa)

Abstract

This paper investigates the contribution of stakeholder collaboration during an open source software migration using a case study. The case study is based on the Presidential National Commission, a South African government department that migrated from proprietary software to open source software in 2007. The organization was one of the few that migrated to open source software as part of a South African government initiative. The case study consisted of semi-structured interviews with the participants involved in the migration. The interviews centered on the contribution of stakeholder collaboration during the software migration using a boundary critique. The results suggest that stakeholder collaboration can contribute to open source software migration. From a managerial perspective, business leaders must understand the value of stakeholder collaboration in open source software migration. Boundary critique can be an important tool for achieving broader collaboration of stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Osden Jokonya & Stan Hardman, 2011. "Boundary Critique and Stakeholder Collaboration in Open Source Software Migration: A Case Study," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jskd.2011100101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jskd00:v:3:y:2011:i:4:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.