IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsir00/v1y2010i4p17-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theoretical Framework for Estimating Swarm Success Probability Using Scouts

Author

Listed:
  • Antons Rebguns

    (The University of Wyoming, USA)

  • Diana F. Spears

    (Swarmotics LLC, USA)

  • Richard Anderson-Sprecher

    (University of Wyoming, USA)

  • Aleksey Kletsov

    (East Carolina University, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel theoretical framework for swarms of agents. Before deploying a swarm for a task, it is advantageous to predict whether a desired percentage of the swarm will succeed. The authors present a framework that uses a small group of expendable “scout” agents to predict the success probability of the entire swarm, thereby preventing many agent losses. The scouts apply one of two formulas to predict – the standard Bernoulli trials formula or the new Bayesian formula. For experimental evaluation, the framework is applied to simulated agents navigating around obstacles to reach a goal location. Extensive experimental results compare the mean-squared error of the predictions of both formulas with ground truth, under varying circumstances. Results indicate the accuracy and robustness of the Bayesian approach. The framework also yields an intriguing result, namely, that both formulas usually predict better in the presence of (Lennard-Jones) inter-agent forces than when their independence assumptions hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Antons Rebguns & Diana F. Spears & Richard Anderson-Sprecher & Aleksey Kletsov, 2010. "A Theoretical Framework for Estimating Swarm Success Probability Using Scouts," International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR), IGI Global, vol. 1(4), pages 17-45, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsir00:v:1:y:2010:i:4:p:17-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jsir.2010100102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsir00:v:1:y:2010:i:4:p:17-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.