IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsesd0/v4y2013i3p61-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scenario-Patent Protection Compared to Climate Change: The Case of Green Patents

Author

Listed:
  • Araken Alves de Lima

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Patricia Carvalho dos Reis

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Julio César Moreira Reis Castelo Branco

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Danieli

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Cibele Cristina Osawa

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Eduardo Winter

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

  • Douglas Alves Santos

    (National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil)

Abstract

The United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) took effect as a treaty in 1994 to promote international cooperation in the fight against global warming. Currently, nearly 190 countries are signatories of the UNFCCC, which has had successive additions as the Kyoto Protocol (1997). In 1995, the Climate Technology Initiative was established within the UNFCCC to encourage international cooperation in the accelerated development and diffusion of environmentally Sound Technologies - EST. Such technologies are also capable of protection provided by patents, and this kind of protection is a valuable tool for the industrial production inventions to become a worthwhile investment, contributing to economic development. Many patent applications claim advantages relative to efficiency, waste reduction, or even the costs of operation/manufacturing. However, the difficulty of accurately distinguishing the EST’s technologies among others, which are those that only claim environmental benefits, compared to those who actually have a higher potential to promote a more positive impact on the environment directed. This study aims to report some performance initiatives in relations between technologies, focusing on the so-called “GREEN”, and the effects of climate change. Some initiatives have already been started in countries such as Australia, Canada, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, South Korea and Israel. These nations are constituted in the form of their industrial property offices, as entities that have implemented regulations regarding the patentability of requests for green technologies or EST’s such requests are known as “green patents” applications. In this context, it is highlighted that the definition of “green patents” differs from country to country and this leads to greater uncertainty in this designation, with the codes of the International Patent Classification (IPC) should be prioritized. This study observed that, in the case of South Korea, green patents are technologies classified in accordance with the interests of the Government, or, according to designations of environmental laws. Moreover, it still shows that South Korea, Australia, United States, Japan, Israel already have programs to promote accelerated examination of “green patents” applications with different criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Araken Alves de Lima & Patricia Carvalho dos Reis & Julio César Moreira Reis Castelo Branco & Rodrigo Danieli & Cibele Cristina Osawa & Eduardo Winter & Douglas Alves Santos, 2013. "Scenario-Patent Protection Compared to Climate Change: The Case of Green Patents," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 61-70, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsesd0:v:4:y:2013:i:3:p:61-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jsesd.2013070105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsesd0:v:4:y:2013:i:3:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.