IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsem00/v9y2020i1p12-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic and Social Assessment of the Syrian Civil War: Who Loses, Who Benefits?

Author

Listed:
  • Viorela-Beatrice Iacovoiu

    (Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Romania)

  • Mirela Panait

    (Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, Romania & Institute of National Economy, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandru-Cristian Enache

    (Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Starting from the theories and studies on armed conflicts and in particular civil wars, and based on relevant figures, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the Syrian Civil War. The Syrian conflict developed into a civil war with a sectarian dimension and has lasted longer mostly because of major powers, as well as some Middle Eastern countries that were directly and actively involved in the conflict, supporting the government forces or rebel groups. According to the analysed data, the war deeply affected the Syrian economy and its citizens due to the loss of governmental control over oil fields, the destruction of infrastructure and households, and the great number of forcibly displaced people and casualties. At the same time, the Syrian Civil War created great opportunities for arms-producing companies to sell their products without cutting off profits. Thus, the conclusion is that there is no benefit to war except for those who profit of it, namely the countries as well as the arms manufacturers that use conflicts as a proxy to promote their interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Viorela-Beatrice Iacovoiu & Mirela Panait & Alexandru-Cristian Enache, 2020. "An Economic and Social Assessment of the Syrian Civil War: Who Loses, Who Benefits?," International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management (IJSEM), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 12-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsem00:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:12-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSEM.2020010102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsem00:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:12-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.