IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsds00/v5y2014i1p76-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Information Categories and Artificial Neural Networks Numerical Algorithms in S&P500 Trend Prediction: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Salim Lahmiri

    (ESCA School of Management, Casablanca, Morocco)

  • Mounir Boukadoum

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada)

  • Sylvain Chartier

    (School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine three major issues. First, the authors compare the performance of economic information, technical indicators, historical information, and investor sentiment measures in financial predictions using backpropagation neural networks (BPNN). Granger causality tests are applied to each category of information to select the relevant variables that statistically and significantly affect stock market shifts. Second, the authors investigate the effect of combining all of these four categories of information variables selected by Granger causality test on the prediction accuracy. Third, the effectiveness of different numerical techniques on the accuracy of BPNN is explored. The authors include conjugate gradient algorithms (Fletcher-Reeves update, Polak-Ribiére update, Powell-Beale restart), quasi-Newton (Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno, BFGS), and the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm which is commonly used in the literature. Fourth, the authors compare the performance of the BPNN and support vector machine (SVM) in terms of stock market trend prediction. Their comparative study is applied to S&P500 data to predict its future moves. The out-of-sample forecasting results show that (i) historical values and sentiment measures allow obtaining higher accuracy than economic information and technical indicators, (ii) combining the four categories of information does not help improving the accuracy of the BPNN and SVM, (iii) the LM algorithm is outperformed by Polak-Ribière, Powell-Beale, and Fletcher-Reeves algorithms, and (iv) the BPNN outperforms the SVM except when using sentiment measures as predictive information.

Suggested Citation

  • Salim Lahmiri & Mounir Boukadoum & Sylvain Chartier, 2014. "Exploring Information Categories and Artificial Neural Networks Numerical Algorithms in S&P500 Trend Prediction: A Comparative Study," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:76-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSDS.2014010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:76-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.