IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsds00/v12y2021i2p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing and Enhancing a Pivotal Organizational Structure Decision-Making Model

Author

Listed:
  • Meredith E. David

    (Baylor University, USA)

  • Forest R. David

    (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Fred R. David

    (Francis Marion University, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents and empirically tests a new point-system-based mathematical decision-making model for determining the most effective organizational structure for any firm type. The model proposes that companies can determine their most effective structure by assessing 11 literature-based characteristics that best describe the firm. Through a survey of 143 executive MBA students, this paper provides results, conclusions, and implications of the first empirical test of a math-based organizational structure decision-making model. The research presented suggests that 11 key variables, or organizational characteristics, should be included in any predictive structure model. Corporate executives need and seek theoretical and practical guidance regarding how to best organize, structure, or re-structure their firm to gain and sustain competitive advantage. The model tested herein provides real-world guidance to managers regarding how to decide which organizational structure is most effective for any given firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Meredith E. David & Forest R. David & Fred R. David, 2021. "Testing and Enhancing a Pivotal Organizational Structure Decision-Making Model," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:12:y:2021:i:2:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSDS.294006
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:12:y:2021:i:2:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.