IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrqeh0/v4y2015i2p51-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Key Stakeholders for an mHealth Pilot Study in Malawi Motivations and Expectations

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne O'Connor

    (University College Cork, Cork, Ireland)

  • Ciara Heavin

    (University College Cork, Cork, Ireland)

  • John O'Donoghue

    (Imperial College London, London, UK)

Abstract

The trial and evaluation of mobile health (mHealth) applications in society is necessary to explore the potential use and benefits of the solution post-trial. In recent years, there is a proliferation of mHealth projects developed and tested in the continent of Africa. The complexity of these projects means that there are typically many stakeholders who are integral to the success of the project. Yet, extant research falls short of capturing the motivations and expectations of multiple key stakeholders (i.e. direct and indirect users) in a single study towards participating in mHealth pilots. To address this gap in research a conceptual model is proposed and examined to explore the impact of motivations and expectations on both community health workers' (direct users) and caregivers' (indirect users) decision to participate in mHealth pilot studies. Findings reveal that both motivations and expectations positively impact decision making, i.e. their decision to participate in the study, with no significant differences emerging between these two groups of stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne O'Connor & Ciara Heavin & John O'Donoghue, 2015. "Review of Key Stakeholders for an mHealth Pilot Study in Malawi Motivations and Expectations," International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 51-66, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrqeh0:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:51-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJRQEH.2015040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrqeh0:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:51-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.