IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrqeh0/v1y2012i2p55-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Barriers and Political Pressures to Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Barach

    (University of Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Numerous high profile inquiries in UK, Australia, and U.S. reveal subtle and overt external pressures that enable and support unsafe care. Understanding these ‘political’ pressures on clinical service executives to execute a government policy regardless of evidence on quality of care is essential to transforming healthcare systems. This article reviews key findings and recommendations from several international inquiries and identifies how to overcome barriers to improvement. Identifying the barriers that contribute to patient harm in national inquiries shows the important influence of external political pressures. Reviewing the commitment across professions represented by specialty boards, royal colleges, academic medical centers, and professional unions to protect patients is key. Understanding that a culture of blame can affect patient safety in healthcare systems and how they manifest depends on the political and healthcare provision characteristics of each country. Transparency the ability to openly discuss and address opportunities for improvement in the healthcare system are a recurring theme in national inquiries. All stakeholders must be involved at all stages and mechanisms for ongoing, effective consultation and communication should be provided at the local and state levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Barach, 2012. "Addressing the Barriers and Political Pressures to Safety," International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 55-64, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrqeh0:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:55-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijrqeh.2012040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrqeh0:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:55-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.