IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/joris0/v3y2012i3p53-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Analytical Network Process Decision Methodology to Analyze and Allocate Resources in the U.S. Army Training Support System

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Diaz

    (Old Dominion University, USA)

  • Barry Charles Ezell

    (Old Dominion University, USA)

Abstract

Deciding on an appropriate training solution mix at the strategic level of U.S. Army training support system enterprise to support warfighter preparation is a complex matter. One of the most important problems is integrating qualitative and quantitative multiple sources of influential information. There are many goals to accomplish while they are constantly changing. However, the best training solution mix option that both minimizes resource impact and maximizes training throughput must be selected. The objective of this paper is to introduce a decision-making methodology based on the Analytical Network Process (ANP) for the U.S. Army Training Support System (ATSS). The methodology assists in the evaluation of training alternatives to help strategic decision makers to select the best mix of training components and strategies. An application of the proposed methodological framework is performed in real world example. The problem involves deciding the right mix of training solutions for urban operation training among a group of selected options.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Diaz & Barry Charles Ezell, 2012. "Using Analytical Network Process Decision Methodology to Analyze and Allocate Resources in the U.S. Army Training Support System," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 3(3), pages 53-73, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:joris0:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:53-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/joris.2012070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:joris0:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:53-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.